H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Kim Clijsters vs Nathalie Tauziat H2H: 3-2

Kim Clijsters holds a 3–2 lead over Nathalie Tauziat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Kim Clijsters leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kim Clijsters won the 2001 New Haven quarterfinal 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Clijsters
BEL Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Nathalie Tauziat
FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 24, 2001* New Haven WTA 500 QF Hard Kim Clijsters #5 6-2 6-2 Nathalie Tauziat #9 Match data
Aug 11, 2001* Los Angeles WTA 500 QF Hard Nathalie Tauziat #9 6-4 6-2 Kim Clijsters #5 Match data
Oct 7, 2000* Filderstadt WTA 500 SF Hard Kim Clijsters #45 3-6 6-4 6-1 Nathalie Tauziat #7 Match data
Aug 26, 2000* New Haven WTA 500 QF Hard Nathalie Tauziat #8 6-2 6-4 Kim Clijsters #33 Match data
Jun 28, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Kim Clijsters #31 6-3 3-6 6-2 Nathalie Tauziat #7 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kim Clijsters #1,140 #1 8,895 2,275 463 127 78.5% 4 7 3 21 6 41
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 546 330 62.3% 0 1 0 1 6 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Clijsters Nathalie Tauziat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 16–7 69.6% #46 1,724 0 1 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0
17 2000 28–15 65.1% #18 1,911 0 3 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0
18 2001 54–19 74.0% #5 2,030 0 6 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0
19 2002 50–17 74.6% #4 2,143 0 10 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,845 0 0
20 2003 86–12 87.8% #2 2,260 0 19 1988 30–19 61.2% #26 1,856 0 0
21 2004 18–4 81.8% #22 2,188 0 21 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,881 0 0
22 2005 66–9 88.0% #2 2,215 1 30 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1
23 2006 41–12 77.4% #5 2,147 1 33 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,970 0 1
24 2007 14–4 77.8% #5 2,113 1 34 1992 38–19 66.7% #14 1,936 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2
26 2009 13–3 81.2% #18 2,128 2 35 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2
27 2010 39–7 84.8% #3 2,182 3 40 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,846 0 3
28 2011 21–7 75.0% #13 2,049 4 41 1996 30–21 58.8% #22 1,806 0 3
29 2012 17–6 73.9% #20 1,989 4 41 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,976 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,024 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,987 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,868 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,863 0 8
37 2020 0–3 0.0% #1030 1,927 4 41 — — — — — — —
38 2021 0–2 0.0% #1154 1,881 4 41 — — — — — — —