H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Kim Clijsters vs Patty Schnyder H2H: 6-3

Kim Clijsters holds a 6–3 lead over Patty Schnyder in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Kim Clijsters leads 4–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Patty Schnyder won the 2009 Luxembourg fourth round 6-4 3-6 7-6(6).

BEL Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 3
9 main draw meetings
SUI Age 47 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 23, 2009* Luxembourg WTA 250 R16 Hard Patty Schnyder #47 6-4 3-6 7-6(6) Kim Clijsters #18 Match data
Aug 13, 2009* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R32 Hard Kim Clijsters #5 6-2 7-5 Patty Schnyder #20 Match data
Jul 30, 2006* Stanford WTA 500 F Hard Kim Clijsters #2 6-4 6-2 Patty Schnyder #8 Match data
May 6, 2005* Berlin WTA 1000 R16 Clay Patty Schnyder #13 6-7(4) 6-5 (ret.) Kim Clijsters #17 Match data
Feb 1, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Hard Kim Clijsters #2 6-2 7-6(2) Patty Schnyder #26 Match data
Sep 27, 2003* Leipzig WTA 500 QF Carpet Kim Clijsters #1 6-1 6-3 Patty Schnyder #21 Match data
Feb 15, 2003* Antwerp WTA 500 QF Carpet Kim Clijsters #3 7-5 6-1 Patty Schnyder #13 Match data
Jan 10, 2003* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Kim Clijsters #4 6-1 6-3 Patty Schnyder #15 Match data
Jun 19, 2000 S Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R16 Grass Patty Schnyder #34 6-4 4-6 7-5 Kim Clijsters #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kim Clijsters #1,140 #1 8,895 2,275 463 127 78.5% 4 7 3 21 6 41
Patty Schnyder #278 #7 3,050 1,987 492 346 58.7% 0 2 0 3 6 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Clijsters Patty Schnyder
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 16–7 69.6% #46 1,724 0 1 1995 1–1 50.0% #143 1,526 0 0
17 2000 28–15 65.1% #18 1,911 0 3 1996 7–9 43.8% #64 1,587 0 0
18 2001 54–19 74.0% #5 2,030 0 6 1997 21–24 46.7% #26 1,710 0 0
19 2002 50–17 74.6% #4 2,143 0 10 1998 51–19 72.9% #11 1,910 0 5
20 2003 86–12 87.8% #2 2,260 0 19 1999 29–23 55.8% #21 1,793 0 6
21 2004 18–4 81.8% #22 2,188 0 21 2000 31–25 55.4% #25 1,751 0 6
22 2005 66–9 88.0% #2 2,215 1 30 2001 24–24 50.0% #37 1,734 0 7
23 2006 41–12 77.4% #5 2,147 1 33 2002 34–24 58.6% #15 1,848 0 8
24 2007 14–4 77.8% #5 2,113 1 34 2003 28–23 54.9% #23 1,818 0 8
25 2004 31–22 58.5% #14 1,793 0 8
26 2009 13–3 81.2% #18 2,128 2 35 2005 58–25 69.9% #7 1,928 0 10
27 2010 39–7 84.8% #3 2,182 3 40 2006 47–25 65.3% #9 1,898 0 10
28 2011 21–7 75.0% #13 2,049 4 41 2007 45–26 63.4% #16 1,879 0 10
29 2012 17–6 73.9% #20 1,989 4 41 2008 33–21 61.1% #14 1,827 0 11
30 2009 21–22 48.8% #42 1,755 0 11
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #44 1,799 0 11
32 2011 3–9 25.0% #55 1,667 0 11
37 2020 0–3 0.0% #1030 1,927 4 41 2016 0–1 0.0% #324 1,631 0 11
38 2021 0–2 0.0% #1154 1,881 4 41 2017 1–1 50.0% #148 1,627 0 11
39 2018 1–3 25.0% #278 1,597 0 11