H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kim Clijsters vs Romina Oprandi H2H: 1-1

Kim Clijsters and Romina Oprandi are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Kim Clijsters won the 2012 's Hertogenbosch round of 32 6-7(5) 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Clijsters
BEL Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Romina Oprandi
Switzerland Age 40 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Clijsters #53 6-7(5) 6-2 6-3 Romina Oprandi #87 Match data Jun 21, 2012* R32 's Hertogenbosch International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Romina Oprandi #82 7-6(5) 6-3 Kim Clijsters #2 Match data Jun 17, 2011* R16 's Hertogenbosch International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Clijsters #1,140 #1 8,895 2,299 466 128 78.5% 4 7 3 18 9 41
Romina Oprandi #895 #32 1,490 1,693 54 88 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Clijsters Romina Oprandi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 16–7 69.6% #46 1,724 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 2000 28–15 65.1% #18 1,913 0 3 — — — — — — —
18 2001 54–19 74.0% #5 2,036 0 6 — — — — — — —
19 2002 50–17 74.6% #4 2,146 0 10 2005 0–1 0.0% #187 1,487 0 0
20 2003 86–12 87.8% #2 2,261 0 19 2006 7–7 50.0% #53 1,547 0 0
21 2004 18–4 81.8% #22 2,246 0 21 2007 5–14 26.3% #256 1,494 0 0
22 2005 66–9 88.0% #2 2,234 1 30 — — — — — — —
23 2006 41–12 77.4% #5 2,165 1 33 2009 0–1 0.0% #215 1,480 0 0
24 2007 14–4 77.8% #5 2,128 1 34 2010 4–5 44.4% #66 1,518 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2011 6–14 30.0% #82 1,522 0 0
26 2009 13–3 81.2% #18 2,140 2 35 2012 9–14 39.1% #61 1,557 0 0
27 2010 39–7 84.8% #3 2,189 3 40 2013 13–13 50.0% #78 1,624 0 0
28 2011 21–7 75.0% #13 2,054 4 41 2014 9–14 39.1% #114 1,580 0 0
29 2012 20–7 74.1% #20 2,022 4 41 2015 1–2 33.3% #124 1,569 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2016 0–3 0.0% #397 1,493 0 0
37 2020 0–3 0.0% #1030 1,956 4 41 — — — — — — —
38 2021 0–2 0.0% #1154 1,908 4 41 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Clijsters Romina Oprandi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 32 12 44 72.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 0 4 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 37 11 48 77.1% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2003 57 7 64 89.1% 15 2 17 88.2% 9 1 10 90.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2006 1 3 4 25.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2004 13 3 16 81.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% 2007 3 7 10 30.0% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — —
22 2005 50 5 55 90.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 24 8 32 75.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2007 14 3 17 82.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 7 8 12.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2009 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 7 10 17 41.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2010 32 4 36 88.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2013 5 6 11 45.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2011 16 4 20 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2014 3 8 11 27.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2012 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 2020 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2021 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 322 80 402 80.1% 59 23 82 72.0% 54 17 71 76.1% 31 8 39 79.5% — 21 46 67 31.3% 28 33 61 45.9% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 201/388 of Kim Clijsters's and 117/140 of Romina Oprandi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kim Clijsters Romina Oprandi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2003 20/98 2.1 2.5 66.4% 70.7% 49.9% 61.6% 57.5% 64.3% 52.7% 2006 4/14 1.5 2.3 61.8% 68.7% 51.4% 75.0% 37.5% 62.0% 47.1%
21 2004 7/22 1.0 4.7 61.9% 68.5% 52.6% 58.8% 62.8% 62.3% 53.8% 2007 14/19 1.2 3.7 64.8% 58.1% 39.1% 47.8% 39.0% 51.4% 41.7%
22 2005 21/75 2.8 4.3 62.2% 71.7% 47.9% 48.4% 54.4% 62.6% 51.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 32/53 2.0 3.3 64.2% 67.8% 47.9% 60.1% 49.3% 60.7% 49.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 13/18 1.8 4.6 60.4% 68.1% 53.6% 46.8% 48.2% 62.7% 49.3% 2010 9/9 0.9 3.2 62.3% 59.3% 43.6% 47.2% 43.8% 53.3% 42.9%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 19/20 1.3 2.5 63.2% 57.0% 42.5% 45.7% 49.2% 51.7% 44.5%
26 2009 16/16 2.8 4.1 63.0% 69.2% 54.9% 62.5% 54.3% 63.7% 48.5% 2012 23/23 0.8 2.2 64.1% 59.4% 47.4% 46.5% 42.7% 54.8% 44.1%
27 2010 42/46 2.9 4.5 62.0% 69.3% 51.6% 61.4% 53.0% 62.6% 50.3% 2013 24/26 1.5 2.2 64.0% 60.5% 49.2% 51.5% 47.5% 56.5% 45.8%
28 2011 27/28 2.0 5.0 64.0% 67.6% 46.2% 56.0% 52.0% 60.1% 50.0% 2014 18/23 0.9 3.2 65.1% 58.1% 45.2% 47.9% 42.2% 53.4% 40.6%
29 2012 18/27 2.5 3.4 66.3% 71.8% 49.0% 57.8% 43.7% 64.1% 47.1% 2015 3/3 2.3 2.3 67.3% 54.1% 42.5% 66.1% 92.9% 49.9% 35.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 3/3 0.3 2.7 70.5% 56.3% 44.6% 49.4% 22.2% 52.8% 34.9%
37 2020 3/3 5.3 6.7 66.9% 62.7% 44.2% 61.9% 30.0% 56.2% 32.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2021 2/2 2.0 9.0 63.1% 58.9% 37.9% 49.2% 41.7% 51.0% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 201/594 2.4 4.1 63.5% 69.1% 49.7% 57.7% 51.7% 62.1% 49.7% — 117/142 1.1 2.7 64.2% 59.0% 45.3% 49.4% 44.9% 54.0% 43.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Clijsters Romina Oprandi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1725 145.5 — — — — -30 -155 -56 67.3% +1.53 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 1913 156.2 — — — — +15 -370 -218 60.2% +0.62 11–8 (58%) 8–2 (80%) 107.4 -1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 2036 161.2 — — — — +15 -316 -171 69.3% +1.43 15–7 (68%) 7–2 (78%) 111.5 -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 2146 168.0 — — — — +28 -315 -318 69.1% +1.50 12–9 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 100.6 -1.80 2005 1487 99.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.02
20 2003 2262 176.5 +7.01 +7.29 1.478 58.4% +19 -206 -246 83.9% +2.65 12–7 (63%) 5–1 (83%) 104.0 -2.52 2006 1548 120.6 +1.33 +1.37 1.239 53.7% -48 +87 — 57.1% +0.57 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.22
21 2004 2247 155.4 +3.47 +3.81 1.426 57.9% +5 — — 90.2% +2.95 2–1 (67%) 4–0 (100%) 102.2 -0.05 2007 1494 106.8 -2.56 -1.16 0.858 46.5% +2 +27 — 35.0% -1.13 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.9 -0.88
22 2005 2235 173.2 +5.59 +5.46 1.367 56.6% +51 -182 -131 85.4% +2.89 7–5 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 97.3 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 2166 165.9 +5.11 +5.07 1.249 54.5% +47 -71 -23 75.2% +1.82 9–4 (69%) 6–2 (75%) 101.0 -2.33 2009 1481 102.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 0–2 — +0.05
24 2007 2128 161.0 +4.97 +3.93 1.322 55.5% +66 — — 70.7% +1.95 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 +0.04 2010 1518 100.5 -1.38 -0.02 0.918 47.8% — +39 — 35.3% -1.35 1–0 — — +0.10
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1522 111.9 -3.05 -0.58 0.922 47.8% -79 +24 +92 41.9% -0.77 1–6 (14%) 3–3 (50%) 95.4 -0.17
26 2009 2141 159.8 +6.04 +5.04 1.334 55.9% +56 — — 73.7% +1.87 4–2 (67%) 0–1 — -1.42 2012 1558 122.9 -0.52 +0.09 0.976 49.4% -46 -25 +74 45.1% -0.45 0–5 (0%) 2–3 (40%) 94.4 +0.40
27 2010 2190 168.6 +6.21 +7.25 1.348 56.4% +54 — -96 76.2% +2.15 11–4 (73%) 6–4 (60%) 103.3 -2.07 2013 1624 126.4 +0.01 +1.10 1.052 51.0% -75 +6 — 49.1% +0.05 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 102.2 +0.81
28 2011 2055 151.4 +3.98 +4.33 1.252 54.8% +97 — — 72.9% +1.73 6–1 (86%) 6–2 (75%) 101.4 +0.06 2014 1581 119.3 -1.87 -2.45 0.871 47.1% -32 +56 — 43.1% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 1–0 — +0.44
29 2012 2023 145.0 +6.00 +3.05 1.314 55.0% +75 — +54 73.6% +1.85 4–1 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 99.1 -0.72 2015 1570 99.2 -3.28 -1.26 0.709 44.1% -29 — — 42.9% -1.72 0–1 — — +0.04
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1494 89.3 -2.34 -2.54 0.738 43.6% — — — 14.3% -2.28 0–1 0–1 — +0.35
37 2020 1956 116.1 +0.27 +0.94 0.751 45.5% +63 — — 14.3% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2021 1908 106.1 +0.32 -1.68 0.864 46.7% — — — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2299 172.4 +5.39 +5.26 1.313 55.7% +36 -226 -114 74.6% +1.92 99–56 (64%) 55–34 (62%) 106.7 -2.42 — 1693 120.4 -1.39 -0.42 0.939 48.5% -45 +35 +86 43.1% -0.56 14–28 (33%) 12–14 (46%) 93.0 +0.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.