H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Kim Clijsters vs Silvia Farina Elia H2H: 6-0

Kim Clijsters holds a 6–0 lead over Silvia Farina Elia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Kim Clijsters leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kim Clijsters won the 2004 Antwerp final 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Clijsters
BEL Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Silvia Farina Elia
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 22, 2004* Antwerp WTA 500 F Hard Kim Clijsters #2 6-3 6-0 Silvia Farina Elia #19 Match data
Feb 14, 2004* Paris WTA 500 QF Carpet Kim Clijsters #2 3-6 7-5 6-3 Silvia Farina Elia #20 Match data
Jan 28, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Kim Clijsters #2 6-3 6-3 Silvia Farina Elia #19 Match data
Jul 4, 2003* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Kim Clijsters #2 5-7 6-0 6-1 Silvia Farina Elia #25 Match data
Jan 10, 2002* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Kim Clijsters #5 6-7(4) 6-4 6-1 Silvia Farina Elia #14 Match data
Sep 29, 2001* Leipzig WTA 500 QF Carpet Kim Clijsters #5 6-1 2-6 6-4 Silvia Farina Elia #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kim Clijsters #1,140 #1 8,895 2,275 463 127 78.5% 4 7 3 21 6 41
Silvia Farina Elia #32 #11 1,838 1,943 365 309 54.2% 0 0 0 3 0 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Clijsters Silvia Farina Elia
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 16–7 69.6% #46 1,724 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 2000 28–15 65.1% #18 1,911 0 3 1989 3–3 50.0% #172 1,522 0 0
18 2001 54–19 74.0% #5 2,030 0 6 1990 2–3 40.0% #194 1,527 0 0
19 2002 50–17 74.6% #4 2,143 0 10 1991 9–9 50.0% #69 1,590 0 0
20 2003 86–12 87.8% #2 2,260 0 19 1992 5–10 33.3% #172 1,578 0 0
21 2004 18–4 81.8% #22 2,188 0 21 1993 9–12 42.9% #85 1,587 0 0
22 2005 66–9 88.0% #2 2,215 1 30 1994 20–19 51.3% #52 1,678 0 0
23 2006 41–12 77.4% #5 2,147 1 33 1995 18–16 52.9% #52 1,650 0 0
24 2007 14–4 77.8% #5 2,113 1 34 1996 22–21 51.2% #34 1,711 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1997 16–22 42.1% #43 1,720 0 0
26 2009 13–3 81.2% #18 2,128 2 35 1998 38–26 59.4% #19 1,901 0 0
27 2010 39–7 84.8% #3 2,182 3 40 1999 30–26 53.6% #26 1,782 0 0
28 2011 21–7 75.0% #13 2,049 4 41 2000 15–17 46.9% #63 1,695 0 0
29 2012 17–6 73.9% #20 1,989 4 41 2001 45–26 63.4% #14 1,768 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2002 42–28 60.0% #17 1,745 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2003 25–25 50.0% #24 1,719 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2004 41–23 64.1% #20 1,770 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2005 25–23 52.1% #32 1,648 0 3
37 2020 0–3 0.0% #1030 1,927 4 41 — — — — — — —
38 2021 0–2 0.0% #1154 1,881 4 41 — — — — — — —