H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Kim Clijsters vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 4-0

Kim Clijsters holds a 4–0 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kim Clijsters leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Clijsters won the 2003 San Diego third round 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Clijsters
BEL Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 31, 2003* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Kim Clijsters #2 6-2 6-0 Virginia Ruano Pascual #65 Match data
May 15, 2003* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Kim Clijsters #2 6-1 6-0 Virginia Ruano Pascual #39 Match data
Jul 20, 2001* Knokke-Heist WTA 250 R16 Clay Kim Clijsters #6 6-2 6-3 Virginia Ruano Pascual #48 Match data
Mar 23, 2001* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Kim Clijsters #16 6-2 2-6 7-5 Virginia Ruano Pascual #78 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kim Clijsters #1,140 #1 8,895 2,275 463 127 78.5% 4 7 3 21 6 41
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,819 199 235 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Clijsters Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 16–7 69.6% #46 1,724 0 1 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 2000 28–15 65.1% #18 1,911 0 3 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 2001 54–19 74.0% #5 2,030 0 6 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,494 0 0
19 2002 50–17 74.6% #4 2,143 0 10 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 2003 86–12 87.8% #2 2,260 0 19 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,477 0 0
21 2004 18–4 81.8% #22 2,188 0 21 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 2005 66–9 88.0% #2 2,215 1 30 1996 8–15 34.8% #87 1,570 0 0
23 2006 41–12 77.4% #5 2,147 1 33 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,730 0 1
24 2007 14–4 77.8% #5 2,113 1 34 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,774 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,659 0 2
26 2009 13–3 81.2% #18 2,128 2 35 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,644 0 2
27 2010 39–7 84.8% #3 2,182 3 40 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 2011 21–7 75.0% #13 2,049 4 41 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,633 0 2
29 2012 17–6 73.9% #20 1,989 4 41 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,646 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,560 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,630 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,622 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,591 0 3
37 2020 0–3 0.0% #1030 1,927 4 41 — — — — — — —
38 2021 0–2 0.0% #1154 1,881 4 41 — — — — — — —