H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kim Hotston vs Camille Bann H2H: 1-0

Kim Hotston holds a 1–0 lead over Camille Bann in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Kim Hotston won the 1981 Worthing round of 16 6-0 6-2.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Hotston 6-0 6-2 Camille Bann Match data Aug 14, 1981* R16 Worthing WTA 250

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Hotston 1,500 8 19 29.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camille Bann 1,502 2 7 22.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Kim Hotston Camille Bann
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1978 1–4 20.0% 1,449 0 0 1981 1–3 25.0% 1,476 0 0
1979 1–1 50.0% 1,452 0 0 1982 1–4 20.0% 1,454 0 0
1980 0–1 0.0% 1,438 0 0
1981 6–12 33.3% 1,404 0 0
1982 0–1 0.0% 1,391 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Kim Hotston Camille Bann
Yr ClayGrass Yr ClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1981 2 2 4 50.0%
1982 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% Career 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Kim Hotston Camille Bann
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1978 1449 91.8 20.0% -1.90 +0.23 1981 1477 94.8 25.0% -2.50 -0.06
1979 1452 104.2 50.0% +1.50 +0.06 1982 1454 100.4 33.3% -0.89 0–1 +0.24
1980 1438 96.5 0.0% -3.50 +0.11
1981 1404 91.1 +174 35.9% -1.13 1–2 (33%) +1.73
1982 1392 95.2 0.0% -4.00 +0.19
Career 1500 91.2 +174 31.6% -1.26 1–2 (33%) +8.59 Career 1503 97.6 29.4% -1.65 0–1 +2.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.