H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kim Hotston vs Jenny Langstaff H2H: 0-1

Jenny Langstaff holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Hotston in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Jenny Langstaff won the 1981 Bournemouth 3 semifinal 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Hotston
GBR
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Jenny Langstaff
GBR

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jenny Langstaff 6-1 6-2 Kim Hotston Match data Aug 8, 1981* SF Bournemouth 3 WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Hotston — — — 1,500 8 19 29.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jenny Langstaff — — — 1,524 7 8 46.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Kim Hotston Jenny Langstaff
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1978 1–4 20.0% — 1,449 0 0 1978 1–2 33.3% — 1,491 0 0
1979 1–1 50.0% — 1,452 0 0 1979 2–1 66.7% — 1,507 0 0
1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,438 0 0 1981 3–4 42.9% — 1,510 0 0
1981 6–12 33.3% — 1,404 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,516 0 1
1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,391 0 0 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Kim Hotston Jenny Langstaff
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1978 1449 91.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.90 — — — +0.23 1978 1492 88.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 — — — -0.17
1979 1452 104.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.50 — — — +0.06 1979 1507 101.4 — — — — — — — 66.7% +0.83 — — — +0.09
1980 1438 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11 1981 1510 103.9 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.57 — — — -0.04
1981 1404 91.1 — — — — — — +174 35.9% -1.13 1–2 (33%) — — +1.73 1983 1516 100.4 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.80 0–1 1–0 — +0.09
1982 1392 95.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1500 91.2 — — — — — — +174 31.6% -1.26 1–2 (33%) — — +8.59 Career 1524 98.3 — — — — — — — 48.4% -0.55 0–1 1–0 — -0.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.