H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kim Hotston vs Jo Harris H2H: 0-1

Jo Harris holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Hotston in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Jo Harris won the 1981 Bournemouth 1 round of 32 6-3 6-2.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jo Harris 6-3 6-2 Kim Hotston Match data Mar 9, 1981* R32 Bournemouth 1 WTA 250

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Hotston 1,500 8 19 29.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jo Harris 1,513 3 8 27.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Kim Hotston Jo Harris
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1978 1–4 20.0% 1,449 0 0 1980 1–2 33.3% 1,502 0 0
1979 1–1 50.0% 1,452 0 0 1981 2–2 50.0% 1,497 0 0
1980 0–1 0.0% 1,438 0 0 1982 0–4 0.0% 1,438 0 0
1981 6–12 33.3% 1,404 0 0
1982 0–1 0.0% 1,391 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Kim Hotston Jo Harris
Yr ClayGrass Yr ClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
1981 2 2 4 50.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0%
1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% Career 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Kim Hotston Jo Harris
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1978 1449 91.8 20.0% -1.90 +0.23 1980 1503 98.9 33.3% -1.83 1–1 -0.41
1979 1452 104.2 50.0% +1.50 +0.06 1981 1497 92.5 33.3% -1.33 +0.55
1980 1438 96.5 0.0% -3.50 +0.11 1982 1438 86.0 0.0% -5.50 +0.30
1981 1404 91.1 +174 35.9% -1.13 1–2 (33%) +1.73
1982 1392 95.2 0.0% -4.00 +0.19
Career 1500 91.2 +174 31.6% -1.26 1–2 (33%) +8.59 Career 1514 90.0 25.0% -2.56 1–1 +4.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.