H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kim Jones vs Dana Gilbert H2H: 1-1

Kim Jones and Dana Gilbert are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Dana Gilbert won the 1982 San Diego round of 64 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Jones
USA Age 68
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Dana Gilbert
USA Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dana Gilbert 6-2 6-3 Kim Jones Match data Jul 28, 1982* R64 San Diego WTA 500 Hard
Kim Jones 7-5 7-6 Dana Gilbert Match data Jul 30, 1981* R32 San Diego WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Jones — — — 1,800 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Dana Gilbert — — — 1,711 61 79 43.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Jones Dana Gilbert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1977 1–1 50.0% — 1,509 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1978 8–5 61.5% — 1,615 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 1979 3–13 18.8% — 1,555 0 1
20 1978 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0 1980 14–12 53.8% — 1,664 0 2
21 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1981 6–12 33.3% — 1,612 0 2
22 1980 1–10 9.1% — 1,422 0 0 1982 20–15 57.1% — 1,663 0 2
23 1981 6–13 31.6% — 1,458 0 0 1983 9–21 30.0% — 1,539 0 2
24 1982 4–14 22.2% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,757 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1984 13–24 35.1% — 1,667 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1985 13–18 41.9% — 1,724 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,677 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,629 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Jones Dana Gilbert
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 2 4 6 33.3% 6 0 6 100.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 3 4 7 42.9% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1980 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 7 5 12 58.3% 13 9 22 59.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1983 5 9 14 35.7% 4 11 15 26.7% — — — — — — — —
24 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1984 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1985 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1986 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 35 52 32.7% 6 15 21 28.6% 13 17 30 43.3% 23 34 57 40.4% — 25 33 58 43.1% 35 33 68 51.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 9 10 10.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Jones Dana Gilbert
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1509 98.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.42
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1616 120.2 — — — — -30 +61 — 58.6% +0.21 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 +0.71
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1556 109.9 — — — — -25 +140 — 22.2% -2.20 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.65
20 1978 1506 102.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.08 1980 1665 123.9 — — — — -113 +95 — 54.8% +0.37 4–8 (33%) 4–0 (100%) 100.9 +1.01
21 1979 1490 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09 1981 1612 104.5 — — — — -26 +81 — 34.9% -1.44 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — +0.39
22 1980 1423 94.6 — — — — +36 — — 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.50 1982 1664 118.1 — — — — -84 +47 — 56.6% +0.49 6–7 (46%) 4–5 (44%) 98.6 +2.19
23 1981 1459 107.5 — — — — +44 +75 — 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +1.50 1983 1540 100.8 — — — — +29 +72 — 34.3% -1.46 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) — +1.52
24 1982 1484 103.7 — — — — -68 -7 +110 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1983 1758 131.9 — — — — -40 — -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1984 1667 132.6 — — — — +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1985 1725 135.5 — — — — -10 — -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1986 1677 104.5 — — — — -12 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1987 1629 103.9 — — — — -23 — — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1801 126.3 — — — — -7 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.88 — 1712 115.9 — — — — -43 +71 — 44.8% -0.54 23–27 (46%) 15–9 (63%) 104.4 +4.92

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.