H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Kim Sands vs Barbara Jordan H2H: 3-0
Kim Sands holds a 3–0 lead over Barbara Jordan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kim Sands leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Sands won the 1983 Nashville third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 1983* | Nashville | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kim Sands | 6-4 6-1 | Barbara Jordan | Match data |
| Sep 17, 1981* | Tokyo Sillook | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kim Sands | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Barbara Jordan | Match data |
| Oct 12, 1978* | Minneapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kim Sands | 6-2 6-2 | Barbara Jordan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Sands | — | — | — | 1,714 | 53 | 123 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Barbara Jordan | — | — | — | 1,711 | 62 | 100 | 38.3% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Sands | Barbara Jordan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,658 | 1 | 1 |
| 23 | 1980 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 14–17 | 45.2% | — | 1,690 | 1 | 1 |
| 24 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,641 | 1 | 1 |
| 25 | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,618 | 1 | 1 |
| 26 | 1983 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,536 | 1 | 1 |
| 27 | 1984 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,524 | 1 | 1 |
| 28 | 1985 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,490 | 1 | 1 |
| 29 | 1986 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |