H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kim Sands vs Dana Gilbert H2H: 0-1

Dana Gilbert holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dana Gilbert leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dana Gilbert won the 1983 Manhattan Beach round of 64 7-5 6-1.

USA Age 69
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dana Gilbert 7-5 6-1 Kim Sands Match data Aug 10, 1983* R64 Manhattan Beach WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Sands 1,713 53 123 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dana Gilbert 1,711 61 79 43.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Sands Dana Gilbert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1977 1–1 50.0% 1,509 0 0
18 1978 8–5 61.5% 1,615 0 1
19 1976 0–1 0.0% 1,488 0 0 1979 3–13 18.8% 1,555 0 1
20 1980 14–12 53.8% 1,664 0 2
21 1978 4–4 50.0% 1,512 0 0 1981 6–12 33.3% 1,612 0 2
22 1979 0–2 0.0% 1,490 0 0 1982 20–15 57.1% 1,663 0 2
23 1980 11–22 33.3% 1,583 0 0 1983 9–21 30.0% 1,539 0 2
24 1981 9–21 30.0% 1,560 0 0
25 1982 3–16 15.8% 1,502 0 0
26 1983 12–13 48.0% 1,622 0 0
27 1984 10–23 30.3% 1,557 0 0
28 1985 3–8 27.3% 1,545 0 0
29 1986 1–10 9.1% 1,479 0 0
30 1987 0–3 0.0% 1,455 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Sands Dana Gilbert
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1977 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1978 2 4 6 33.3% 6 0 6 100.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1978 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1981 3 4 7 42.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 7 5 12 58.3% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1980 4 7 11 36.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 1983 5 9 14 35.7% 4 11 15 26.7%
24 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 7 9 22.2%
25 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1986 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 18 35 53 34.0% 9 30 39 23.1% 12 24 36 33.3% 14 33 47 29.8% 25 33 58 43.1% 35 33 68 51.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 9 10 10.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Sands Dana Gilbert
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1977 1509 98.0 40.0% -1.00 1–0 +0.42
18 1978 1616 120.2 -30 +61 58.6% +0.21 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 +0.71
19 1976 1489 94.4 0.0% -5.50 -0.17 1979 1556 109.9 -25 +140 22.2% -2.20 2–2 (50%) 1–1 +0.65
20 1980 1665 123.9 -113 +95 54.8% +0.37 4–8 (33%) 4–0 (100%) 100.9 +1.01
21 1978 1512 108.5 +52 57.1% +0.72 1–4 (20%) 0–1 +1.67 1981 1612 104.5 -26 +81 34.9% -1.44 4–3 (57%) 1–1 +0.39
22 1979 1490 96.5 20.0% -1.60 0–1 +0.15 1982 1664 118.1 -84 +47 56.6% +0.49 6–7 (46%) 4–5 (44%) 98.6 +2.19
23 1980 1583 118.8 +6 -110 -44 32.5% -1.52 8–3 (73%) 1–3 (25%) 105.8 -0.85 1983 1540 100.8 +29 +72 34.3% -1.46 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) +1.52
24 1981 1560 111.4 -8 -100 +50 35.7% -1.06 3–7 (30%) 1–1 +0.95
25 1982 1503 104.0 +5 -143 +77 23.3% -1.88 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 -0.85
26 1983 1623 121.1 -14 -159 -27 51.6% 0.00 5–9 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 99.7 +1.37
27 1984 1557 125.8 +50 -118 -7 31.9% -1.14 3–2 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 98.6 -1.83
28 1985 1546 109.7 +25 -108 33.3% -1.26 2–3 (40%) 1–1 +0.26
29 1986 1480 109.1 +10 20.0% -1.60 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 93.5 +0.18
30 1987 1456 103.5 14.3% -2.28 0–1 -0.17
Career 1714 119.0 +12 -124 +20 34.9% -1.08 23–37 (38%) 10–19 (34%) 92.4 +0.40 1712 115.9 -43 +71 44.8% -0.54 23–27 (46%) 15–9 (63%) 104.4 +4.92

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.