H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kim Sands vs Hana Mandlikova H2H: 1-1
Kim Sands and Hana Mandlikova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Sands leads 1–0 on grass, while Hana Mandlikova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Sands won the 1981 Eastbourne third round 0-6 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 69
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 1981* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Kim Sands | 0-6 6-0 6-3 | Hana Mandlikova | Match data |
| Sep 12, 1980* | Tokyo Sillook | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Hana Mandlikova | 6-3 6-4 | Kim Sands | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Sands | — | — | — | 1,714 | 53 | 123 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,299 | 516 | 191 | 73.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 25 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Sands | Hana Mandlikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,985 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | — | 2,230 | 1 | 11 |
| 19 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | — | 2,108 | 2 | 14 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | — | 1,998 | 2 | 14 |
| 21 | 1978 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,977 | 2 | 14 |
| 22 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,081 | 2 | 19 |
| 23 | 1980 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,210 | 3 | 22 |
| 24 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,233 | 3 | 22 |
| 25 | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,136 | 4 | 25 |
| 26 | 1983 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,031 | 4 | 25 |
| 27 | 1984 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,941 | 4 | 25 |
| 28 | 1985 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,809 | 4 | 25 |
| 29 | 1986 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |