H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kim Sands vs Julie Harrington H2H: 2-0

Kim Sands holds a 2–0 lead over Julie Harrington in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Sands leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kim Sands won the 1983 Richmond round of 16 6-4 6-4.

USA Age 69
H2H
2 0
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Sands 6-4 6-4 Julie Harrington Match data Sep 23, 1983* R16 Richmond WTA 250 Carpet
Kim Sands 6-4 6-4 Julie Harrington Match data Jan 21, 1982* R32 Seattle WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Sands 1,713 53 123 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Julie Harrington #175 #70 1,741 55 80 40.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Sands Julie Harrington
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1979 3–6 33.3% 1,523 0 0
18 1980 12–17 41.4% 1,602 0 0
19 1976 0–1 0.0% 1,488 0 0 1981 18–15 54.5% 1,724 0 0
20 1982 6–19 24.0% 1,589 0 0
21 1978 4–4 50.0% 1,512 0 0 1983 15–16 48.4% 1,629 0 0
22 1979 0–2 0.0% 1,490 0 0 1984 1–7 12.5% #175 1,571 0 0
23 1980 11–22 33.3% 1,583 0 0
24 1981 9–21 30.0% 1,560 0 0
25 1982 3–16 15.8% 1,502 0 0
26 1983 12–13 48.0% 1,622 0 0
27 1984 10–23 30.3% 1,557 0 0
28 1985 3–8 27.3% 1,545 0 0
29 1986 1–10 9.1% 1,479 0 0
30 1987 0–3 0.0% 1,455 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Sands Julie Harrington
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1979 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1980 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1981 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
20 1982 1 6 7 14.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 7 8 12.5%
21 1978 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 11 8 19 57.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1980 4 7 11 36.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 8 13 38.5%
24 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 7 9 22.2%
25 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1986 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 18 35 53 34.0% 9 30 39 23.1% 12 24 36 33.3% 14 33 47 29.8% 28 31 59 47.5% 12 20 32 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 11 22 33 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Sands Julie Harrington
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1979 1524 114.6 +97 42.9% -0.76 0–3 (0%) 1–1 +0.68
18 1980 1602 125.8 -16 -20 -127 42.9% -0.17 2–5 (29%) 2–6 (25%) 94.7 -1.23
19 1976 1489 94.4 0.0% -5.50 -0.17 1981 1725 127.6 +24 -106 48.1% -0.03 10–3 (77%) 3–4 (43%) 108.5 +2.87
20 1982 1589 116.4 -34 +6 31.1% -1.28 4–7 (36%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.86
21 1978 1512 108.5 +52 57.1% +0.72 1–4 (20%) 0–1 +1.67 1983 1629 115.5 +33 -32 48.6% -0.35 5–5 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.6 +2.39
22 1979 1490 96.5 20.0% -1.60 0–1 +0.15 1984 1571 105.9 +13 22.2% -1.83 0–2 3–1 (75%) -0.33
23 1980 1583 118.8 +6 -110 -44 32.5% -1.52 8–3 (73%) 1–3 (25%) 105.8 -0.85
24 1981 1560 111.4 -8 -100 +50 35.7% -1.06 3–7 (30%) 1–1 +0.95
25 1982 1503 104.0 +5 -143 +77 23.3% -1.88 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 -0.85
26 1983 1623 121.1 -14 -159 -27 51.6% 0.00 5–9 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 99.7 +1.37
27 1984 1557 125.8 +50 -118 -7 31.9% -1.14 3–2 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 98.6 -1.83
28 1985 1546 109.7 +25 -108 33.3% -1.26 2–3 (40%) 1–1 +0.26
29 1986 1480 109.1 +10 20.0% -1.60 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 93.5 +0.18
30 1987 1456 103.5 14.3% -2.28 0–1 -0.17
Career 1714 119.0 +12 -124 +20 34.9% -1.08 23–37 (38%) 10–19 (34%) 92.4 +0.40 1741 124.4 +18 -28 -127 42.0% -0.53 21–25 (46%) 14–16 (47%) 101.0 +2.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.