H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kim Sands vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 0-3

Kathy Horvath holds a 3–0 lead over Kim Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kathy Horvath leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Kathy Horvath won the 1983 Indianapolis round of 32 6-2 7-5.

USA Age 69
H2H
0 3
3 main-draw meetings
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kathy Horvath 6-2 7-5 Kim Sands Match data Aug 3, 1983* R32 Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay
Kathy Horvath 6-2 6-3 Kim Sands Match data May 13, 1982* R32 Lugano WTA 250 Clay
Kathy Horvath 6-2 6-3 Kim Sands Match data May 29, 1980* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Sands 1,713 53 123 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kathy Horvath #283 #10 24 1,975 187 155 54.7% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Sands Kathy Horvath
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1979 0–2 0.0% 1,496 0 0
14 1980 6–7 46.2% 1,563 0 0
15 1981 34–23 59.6% 1,858 0 2
16 1982 15–17 46.9% 1,775 0 2
17 1983 39–18 68.4% 1,930 0 4
18 1984 25–19 56.8% #29 1,799 0 4
19 1976 0–1 0.0% 1,488 0 0 1985 23–16 59.0% #34 1,775 0 6
20 1986 16–15 51.6% #47 1,739 0 6
21 1978 4–4 50.0% 1,512 0 0 1987 18–15 54.5% #37 1,714 0 7
22 1979 0–2 0.0% 1,490 0 0 1988 9–15 37.5% #85 1,602 0 7
23 1980 11–22 33.3% 1,583 0 0 1989 2–8 20.0% #224 1,529 0 7
24 1981 9–21 30.0% 1,560 0 0
25 1982 3–16 15.8% 1,502 0 0
26 1983 12–13 48.0% 1,622 0 0
27 1984 10–23 30.3% 1,557 0 0
28 1985 3–8 27.3% 1,545 0 0
29 1986 1–10 9.1% 1,479 0 0
30 1987 0–3 0.0% 1,455 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Sands Kathy Horvath
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1979 0 2 2 0.0%
14 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0%
15 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 15 8 23 65.2% 12 11 23 52.2%
16 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2%
17 1983 9 4 13 69.2% 21 11 32 65.6% 9 3 12 75.0%
18 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 21 9 30 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
19 1985 6 5 11 54.5% 17 7 24 70.8% 0 4 4 0.0%
20 1986 8 7 15 53.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1978 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1980 4 7 11 36.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 1989 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 7 9 22.2%
25 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1986 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 18 35 53 34.0% 9 30 39 23.1% 12 24 36 33.3% 14 33 47 29.8% 45 50 95 47.4% 111 67 178 62.4% 3 6 9 33.3% 28 32 60 46.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Sands Kathy Horvath
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1979 1497 113.4 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 -0.25
14 1980 1563 110.2 +45 -63 43.3% -0.37 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.0 -0.09
15 1981 1859 146.5 -40 -79 56.3% +0.44 11–7 (61%) 7–5 (58%) 108.4 +0.14
16 1982 1775 143.3 -40 +62 52.9% +0.46 1–7 (13%) 2–3 (40%) 92.6 -4.36
17 1983 1931 149.2 -65 +55 63.7% +0.74 9–3 (75%) 11–6 (65%) 109.3 +1.14
18 1984 1799 146.8 -83 +206 56.1% +0.43 5–5 (50%) 3–7 (30%) 94.7 +0.34
19 1976 1489 94.4 0.0% -5.50 -0.17 1985 1776 138.0 -112 +220 55.8% +0.24 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 104.1 -0.67
20 1986 1740 130.3 -73 +184 -140 48.6% -0.18 7–3 (70%) 3–3 (50%) 104.3 -1.58
21 1978 1512 108.5 +52 57.1% +0.72 1–4 (20%) 0–1 +1.67 1987 1714 125.9 -43 +149 54.1% +0.18 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 +3.16
22 1979 1490 96.5 20.0% -1.60 0–1 +0.15 1988 1603 116.3 +7 +113 41.5% -0.64 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 94.3 +0.35
23 1980 1583 118.8 +6 -110 -44 32.5% -1.52 8–3 (73%) 1–3 (25%) 105.8 -0.85 1989 1530 101.0 +17 33.3% -1.38 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 95.4 +0.29
24 1981 1560 111.4 -8 -100 +50 35.7% -1.06 3–7 (30%) 1–1 +0.95
25 1982 1503 104.0 +5 -143 +77 23.3% -1.88 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 -0.85
26 1983 1623 121.1 -14 -159 -27 51.6% 0.00 5–9 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 99.7 +1.37
27 1984 1557 125.8 +50 -118 -7 31.9% -1.14 3–2 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 98.6 -1.83
28 1985 1546 109.7 +25 -108 33.3% -1.26 2–3 (40%) 1–1 +0.26
29 1986 1480 109.1 +10 20.0% -1.60 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 93.5 +0.18
30 1987 1456 103.5 14.3% -2.28 0–1 -0.17
Career 1714 119.0 +12 -124 +20 34.9% -1.08 23–37 (38%) 10–19 (34%) 92.4 +0.40 1976 144.0 -49 +106 -140 53.7% +0.21 49–40 (55%) 39–36 (52%) 103.2 -0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.