H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kim Sands vs Pam Casale H2H: 0-1

Pam Casale holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pam Casale leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1984 Marco Island round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Sands

USA Age 69

H2H

0 – 1

1 main-draw meetings

Pam Casale

USA Age 62 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Pam Casale #32	6-2 6-2	Kim Sands	Match data	Jan 26, 1984*	R32	Marco Island	WTA 250	Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Kim Sands	—	—	—	1,713	53	123	30.1%	0	0	0	0	0	0
Pam Casale	#671	#14	22	1,944	168	147	53.3%	0	0	0	0	0	0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Kim Sands							Pam Casale
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1980	15–10	60.0%	—	1,597	0	0
17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1981	30–17	63.8%	—	1,810	0	0
18	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1982	20–23	46.5%	—	1,745	0	0
19	1976	0–1	0.0%	—	1,488	0	0	1983	23–20	53.5%	—	1,770	0	0
20	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1984	31–17	64.6%	#15	1,914	0	0
21	1978	4–4	50.0%	—	1,512	0	0	1985	24–20	54.5%	#14	1,814	0	0
22	1979	0–2	0.0%	—	1,490	0	0	1986	16–17	48.5%	#41	1,787	0	0
23	1980	11–22	33.3%	—	1,583	0	0	1987	5–11	31.2%	#111	1,673	0	0
24	1981	9–21	30.0%	—	1,560	0	0	1988	4–10	28.6%	#169	1,552	0	0
25	1982	3–16	15.8%	—	1,502	0	0	1989	0–1	0.0%	#225	1,547	0	0
26	1983	12–13	48.0%	—	1,622	0	0	1990	0–1	0.0%	#554	1,525	0	0
27	1984	10–23	30.3%	—	1,557	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1985	3–8	27.3%	—	1,545	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1986	1–10	9.1%	—	1,479	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1987	0–3	0.0%	—	1,455	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Kim Sands																	Pam Casale
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1980	8	7	15	53.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1981	17	6	23	73.9%	7	5	12	58.3%	4	3	7	57.1%	2	3	5	40.0%
18	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1982	2	4	6	33.3%	10	7	17	58.8%	2	2	4	50.0%	6	10	16	37.5%
19	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1983	5	5	10	50.0%	13	8	21	61.9%	3	3	6	50.0%	2	4	6	33.3%
20	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1984	8	3	11	72.7%	8	5	13	61.5%	4	3	7	57.1%	11	6	17	64.7%
21	1978	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	3	3	6	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	1985	17	7	24	70.8%	4	5	9	44.4%	0	3	3	0.0%	3	5	8	37.5%
22	1979	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1986	3	6	9	33.3%	11	5	16	68.8%	1	1	2	50.0%	1	5	6	16.7%
23	1980	4	7	11	36.4%	0	3	3	0.0%	2	4	6	33.3%	5	8	13	38.5%	1987	3	5	8	37.5%	1	1	2	50.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	0	2	2	0.0%
24	1981	1	5	6	16.7%	2	6	8	25.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	2	7	9	22.2%	1988	3	6	9	33.3%	1	3	4	25.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
25	1982	0	1	1	0.0%	1	7	8	12.5%	1	4	5	20.0%	1	4	5	20.0%	1989	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	1983	5	5	10	50.0%	2	3	5	40.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	1990	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1984	7	9	16	43.8%	1	6	7	14.3%	0	4	4	0.0%	2	4	6	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1985	1	3	4	25.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1986	0	4	4	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	0	3	3	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1987	0	1	1	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	18	35	53	34.0%	9	30	39	23.1%	12	24	36	33.3%	14	33	47	29.8%	—	66	49	115	57.4%	55	41	96	57.3%	15	19	34	44.1%	25	35	60	41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Kim Sands																Pam Casale
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1980	1598	118.7	—	—	—	—	+29	—	—	57.4%	+0.72	3–3 (50%)	1–1	—	+2.02
17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1981	1811	140.3	—	—	—	—	-1	-153	-196	64.1%	+1.03	3–6 (33%)	6–0 (100%)	101.9	+1.97
18	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1982	1745	140.3	—	—	—	—	-54	-4	-106	50.5%	+0.01	1–8 (11%)	9–5 (64%)	95.5	-3.37
19	1976	1489	94.4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-5.50	—	—	—	-0.17	1983	1770	144.1	—	—	—	—	-55	+93	-103	52.1%	+0.47	5–3 (63%)	3–3 (50%)	102.6	-1.57
20	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1984	1914	155.3	—	—	—	—	+6	-60	-210	64.8%	+1.01	3–6 (33%)	7–3 (70%)	100.3	-2.46
21	1978	1512	108.5	—	—	—	—	—	—	+52	57.1%	+0.72	1–4 (20%)	0–1	—	+1.67	1985	1814	137.6	—	—	—	—	+80	-54	-188	53.1%	+0.34	6–4 (60%)	3–3 (50%)	98.8	-1.08
22	1979	1490	96.5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	20.0%	-1.60	0–1	—	—	+0.15	1986	1788	137.1	—	—	—	—	-56	+52	—	46.8%	-0.18	7–4 (64%)	6–3 (67%)	103.7	-3.63
23	1980	1583	118.8	—	—	—	—	+6	-110	-44	32.5%	-1.52	8–3 (73%)	1–3 (25%)	105.8	-0.85	1987	1673	114.3	—	—	—	—	-20	—	-77	41.7%	-0.56	3–5 (38%)	2–1 (67%)	—	-0.50
24	1981	1560	111.4	—	—	—	—	-8	-100	+50	35.7%	-1.06	3–7 (30%)	1–1	—	+0.95	1988	1552	100.5	—	—	—	—	+25	+207	—	36.4%	-0.79	1–4 (20%)	1–2 (33%)	92.4	+1.01
25	1982	1503	104.0	—	—	—	—	+5	-143	+77	23.3%	-1.88	1–4 (20%)	2–2 (50%)	97.7	-0.85	1989	1547	93.6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-5.50	—	—	—	-0.21
26	1983	1623	121.1	—	—	—	—	-14	-159	-27	51.6%	0.00	5–9 (36%)	3–2 (60%)	99.7	+1.37	1990	1526	90.6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-5.00	—	—	—	+0.21
27	1984	1557	125.8	—	—	—	—	+50	-118	-7	31.9%	-1.14	3–2 (60%)	2–5 (29%)	98.6	-1.83	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1985	1546	109.7	—	—	—	—	+25	-108	—	33.3%	-1.26	2–3 (40%)	1–1	—	+0.26	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1986	1480	109.1	—	—	—	—	+10	—	—	20.0%	-1.60	0–3 (0%)	0–4 (0%)	93.5	+0.18	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1987	1456	103.5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	14.3%	-2.28	0–1	—	—	-0.17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1714	119.0	—	—	—	—	+12	-124	+20	34.9%	-1.08	23–37 (38%)	10–19 (34%)	92.4	+0.40	—	1944	143.5	—	—	—	—	+1	+5	-153	53.9%	+0.36	32–43 (43%)	38–21 (64%)	100.1	-2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Kim Sands's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Rosalyn Fairbank	0	7	7	Aug 6, 1986	H2H
Barbara Potter	0	6	6	Feb 2, 1984	H2H
Candy Reynolds	1	3	4	Feb 27, 1986	H2H
Zina Garrison	0	4	4	Sep 26, 1985	H2H
Wendy White	1	3	4	Nov 11, 1983	H2H

Pam Casale's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel	3	7	10	May 10, 1986	H2H
Pilar Vasquez	5	2	7	Apr 6, 1988	H2H
Bonnie Gadusek	0	7	7	Oct 13, 1985	H2H
Bettina Bunge	1	5	6	Feb 19, 1987	H2H
Zina Garrison	3	3	6	Nov 13, 1986	H2H