H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kim Sands vs Paula Smith H2H: 2-1
Kim Sands holds a 2–1 lead over Paula Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kim Sands leads 1–0 on carpet, while Paula Smith leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kim Sands won the 1983 Nashville fourth round 6-2 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 1983* | Nashville | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Kim Sands | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | Paula Smith | Match data |
| Apr 7, 1982* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Paula Smith | 6-4 6-2 | Kim Sands | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1980* | Minneapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kim Sands | 7-6 6-2 | Paula Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Sands | — | — | — | 1,714 | 53 | 123 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paula Smith | #393 | #194 | 1 | 1,632 | 59 | 116 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Sands | Paula Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1980 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 13–22 | 37.1% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 9–18 | 33.3% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1983 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1984 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1985 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1986 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #199 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #351 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |