H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kim Steinmetz vs Julie Harrington H2H: 0-1

Julie Harrington holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Steinmetz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julie Harrington leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Harrington won the 1981 Tokyo Borden round of 16 5-7 6-0 6-3.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julie Harrington 5-7 6-0 6-3 Kim Steinmetz Match data Oct 16, 1981* R16 Tokyo Borden WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Steinmetz #625 #99 6 1,649 48 78 38.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Julie Harrington #175 #70 1,741 55 80 40.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Steinmetz Julie Harrington
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1979 3–6 33.3% 1,523 0 0
18 1980 12–17 41.4% 1,602 0 0
19 1981 18–15 54.5% 1,724 0 0
20 1978 0–1 0.0% 1,487 0 0 1982 6–19 24.0% 1,589 0 0
21 1983 15–16 48.4% 1,629 0 0
22 1980 11–4 73.3% 1,593 0 0 1984 1–7 12.5% #175 1,571 0 0
23 1981 6–12 33.3% 1,552 0 0
24 1982 12–12 50.0% 1,626 0 0
25 1983 6–15 28.6% 1,547 0 0
26 1984 6–8 42.9% #102 1,570 0 0
27 1985 0–7 0.0% 1,477 0 0
28 1986 0–2 0.0% 1,467 0 0
29 1987 0–2 0.0% #215 1,447 0 0
30 1988 7–10 41.2% #133 1,506 0 0
31 1989 0–4 0.0% #478 1,470 0 0
33 1991 0–1 0.0% #496 1,460 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Steinmetz Julie Harrington
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1979 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1980 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1981 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
20 1982 1 6 7 14.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 7 8 12.5%
21 1983 11 8 19 57.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1980 11 3 14 78.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 1983 3 5 8 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
26 1984 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1988 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 1989 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1991 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 12 28 40 30.0% 19 20 39 48.7% 15 21 36 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 28 31 59 47.5% 12 20 32 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 11 22 33 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Steinmetz Julie Harrington
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1979 1524 114.6 +97 42.9% -0.76 0–3 (0%) 1–1 +0.68
18 1980 1602 125.8 -16 -20 -127 42.9% -0.17 2–5 (29%) 2–6 (25%) 94.7 -1.23
19 1981 1725 127.6 +24 -106 48.1% -0.03 10–3 (77%) 3–4 (43%) 108.5 +2.87
20 1978 1488 101.3 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 -0.07 1982 1589 116.4 -34 +6 31.1% -1.28 4–7 (36%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.86
21 1983 1629 115.5 +33 -32 48.6% -0.35 5–5 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.6 +2.39
22 1980 1593 118.4 +79 71.0% +1.64 1–0 2–2 (50%) +2.46 1984 1571 105.9 +13 22.2% -1.83 0–2 3–1 (75%) -0.33
23 1981 1552 109.7 +36 +106 +7 35.1% -0.54 0–1 0–4 (0%) +0.13
24 1982 1626 120.3 -98 +40 +17 49.2% -0.21 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 +0.70
25 1983 1548 112.1 -19 +105 +39 34.8% -0.78 0–4 (0%) 1–2 (33%) +0.14
26 1984 1571 110.2 -91 +101 43.3% -0.40 1–1 2–1 (67%) +1.44
27 1985 1478 88.9 -31 +49 12.5% -2.56 0–2 +0.89
28 1986 1468 91.9 0.0% -4.50 -0.13
29 1987 1448 100.6 20.0% -1.20 0–1 0–1 +0.14
30 1988 1507 108.7 -42 +55 39.5% -0.60 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 103.2 +0.61
31 1989 1471 98.2 -32 20.0% -2.30 0–2 0–1 -0.08
33 1991 1460 93.0 0.0% -5.50 +0.05
Career 1650 113.2 -38 +74 +45 40.6% -0.55 12–19 (39%) 9–16 (36%) 93.3 +4.98 1741 124.4 +18 -28 -127 42.0% -0.53 21–25 (46%) 14–16 (47%) 101.0 +2.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.