H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Kimberly Birrell vs Zarina Diyas
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Kimberly Birrell vs Zarina Diyas.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 28
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 32
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimberly Birrell | #65 | #61 | 999 | 1,835 | 47 | 57 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zarina Diyas | #437 | #31 | 1,495 | 1,751 | 99 | 127 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kimberly Birrell | Zarina Diyas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #242 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #516 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #250 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #150 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #741 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #66 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #89 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2023 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #77 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #113 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #80 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #102 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2026 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #65 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |