H2H data updated: 2026-10-08 00:00 UTC
Kimiko Date holds a 2–1 lead over Laura Robson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 2013 Japan Women's Open round of 32 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | 6-4 6-4 | Laura Robson | Match data | Oct 10, 2013* | R32 | Japan Women's Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Laura Robson | 6-4 6-4 | Kimiko Date | Match data | Oct 3, 2012* | R64 | China Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Kimiko Date | 6-3 6-3 | Laura Robson | Match data | Oct 14, 2010* | R32 | Japan Women's Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | #1,191 | #4 | 1,280 | 2,092 | 245 | 190 | 56.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| Laura Robson | #764 | #27 | 1,685 | 1,710 | 39 | 63 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kimiko Date | Laura Robson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #517 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #217 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #119 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #53 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #44 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #916 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #21 | 1,853 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #557 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,947 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #222 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #9 | 1,985 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | #4 | 2,029 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1996 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #8 | 2,077 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 2,048 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #69 | 1,845 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #99 | 1,456 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #75 | 1,576 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,597 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,573 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1191 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Kimiko Date | Laura Robson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2013 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2014 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 18 | 6 | 24 | 75.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2016 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1994 | 26 | 5 | 31 | 83.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2017 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1995 | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1996 | 25 | 8 | 33 | 75.8% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2008 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2009 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2010 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2011 | 4 | 16 | 20 | 20.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2012 | 2 | 11 | 13 | 15.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 2013 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 2014 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | 2015 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 170 | 127 | 297 | 57.2% | 24 | 27 | 51 | 47.1% | 31 | 24 | 55 | 56.4% | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | — | 22 | 33 | 55 | 40.0% | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 9 | 18 | 27 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Kimiko Date | Laura Robson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1490 | 101.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.05 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1484 | 103.3 | -0.52 | +0.53 | 0.867 | 47.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.12 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1474 | 102.2 | +0.56 | -5.19 | 0.742 | 45.8% | — | — | +98 | 0.0% | -2.40 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.50 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1508 | 110.8 | +0.58 | -0.57 | 0.932 | 48.6% | +1 | — | +42 | 26.7% | -1.00 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.08 |
| 18 | 1989 | 1563 | 118.2 | — | — | — | — | -9 | — | +53 | 48.0% | +0.24 | 3–0 (100%) | 1–1 | — | +1.20 | 2012 | 1658 | 135.1 | +1.17 | +0.07 | 1.034 | 51.0% | -32 | -64 | -60 | 52.2% | +0.28 | 4–5 (44%) | 4–5 (44%) | 102.4 | -0.14 |
| 19 | 1990 | 1665 | 128.2 | — | — | — | — | -15 | — | — | 57.1% | +0.40 | 1–0 | 3–2 (60%) | — | -0.03 | 2013 | 1662 | 129.1 | +1.89 | -0.67 | 1.015 | 50.1% | -53 | -51 | -31 | 46.2% | -0.04 | 6–7 (46%) | 3–9 (25%) | 96.6 | -0.17 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1725 | 132.7 | — | — | — | — | -22 | — | -81 | 52.7% | +0.15 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–1 (75%) | 100.6 | +0.73 | 2014 | 1630 | 100.1 | -4.77 | -2.42 | 0.663 | 41.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.11 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1854 | 155.6 | — | — | — | — | +53 | -237 | -209 | 60.9% | +0.92 | 8–2 (80%) | 1–5 (17%) | 104.6 | -0.72 | 2015 | 1595 | 101.1 | -0.86 | -1.36 | 0.846 | 46.6% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.20 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.19 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1948 | 158.1 | — | — | — | — | +75 | -344 | — | 62.8% | +1.00 | 7–1 (88%) | 4–3 (57%) | 105.3 | -0.46 | 2016 | 1512 | 105.4 | -2.56 | -1.79 | 0.776 | 45.0% | +6 | +50 | — | 15.8% | -2.10 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.25 |
| 23 | 1994 | 1985 | 161.2 | — | — | — | — | +87 | -347 | -333 | 67.0% | +1.34 | 10–7 (59%) | 3–1 (75%) | 99.4 | -0.33 | 2017 | 1465 | 96.8 | -2.08 | -0.78 | 0.802 | 45.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.75 | — | — | — | +0.18 |
| 24 | 1995 | 2030 | 160.2 | — | — | — | — | +41 | -192 | -291 | 71.6% | +1.43 | 11–5 (69%) | 6–1 (86%) | 104.6 | -2.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1996 | 2077 | 165.2 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -248 | -187 | 65.8% | +1.32 | 11–9 (55%) | 1–5 (17%) | 97.0 | -0.42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2008 | 2049 | 101.3 | +0.44 | -0.26 | 0.663 | 40.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2009 | 1845 | 123.3 | -0.97 | +0.28 | 0.931 | 48.6% | +25 | — | — | 44.4% | -0.38 | 3–8 (27%) | 2–3 (40%) | 87.7 | -0.84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2010 | 1823 | 145.4 | -0.25 | +1.83 | 0.998 | 49.9% | +18 | -46 | — | 51.8% | -0.11 | 11–8 (58%) | 9–2 (82%) | 107.5 | -3.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2011 | 1571 | 117.6 | -2.22 | +0.23 | 0.876 | 46.9% | +27 | +117 | +226 | 27.3% | -1.21 | 0–4 (0%) | 3–10 (23%) | 88.8 | -2.48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2012 | 1457 | 113.8 | -2.85 | -1.69 | 0.875 | 47.1% | +33 | — | — | 20.0% | -1.63 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–1 | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 2013 | 1576 | 135.2 | -1.65 | +2.04 | 0.997 | 50.0% | +7 | — | +183 | 46.4% | +0.04 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–7 (0%) | 93.6 | -0.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 2014 | 1597 | 125.2 | -1.57 | -0.21 | 0.942 | 48.7% | -18 | — | +178 | 50.8% | -0.15 | 5–8 (38%) | 5–4 (56%) | 97.7 | -0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | 2015 | 1574 | 113.0 | -2.60 | -0.62 | 0.817 | 46.3% | -2 | — | — | 35.0% | -0.65 | 1–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | 2017 | 1564 | 90.3 | +0.60 | +0.07 | 0.246 | 20.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -6.00 | — | — | — | -0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2093 | 154.4 | -1.51 | +0.62 | 0.928 | 48.3% | +30 | -185 | -61 | 55.2% | +0.45 | 77–65 (54%) | 42–48 (47%) | 95.3 | -2.24 | — | 1710 | 126.6 | +0.75 | -0.88 | 0.952 | 49.1% | -36 | -35 | -6 | 39.8% | -0.43 | 11–16 (41%) | 9–18 (33%) | 96.1 | -0.87 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 2 | 7 | 9 | Aug 25, 1996 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 6 | 2 | 8 | Aug 24, 1996 | H2H |
| Naoko Sawamatsu | 5 | 3 | 8 | Feb 2, 1996 | H2H |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 3 | 4 | 7 | Aug 24, 1996 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 7 | 7 | Jul 7, 1996 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ayumi Morita | 2 | 2 | 4 | Sep 25, 2013 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 29, 2016 | H2H |
| Kimiko Date | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 10, 2013 | H2H |
| Lourdes Domínguez Lino | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 28, 2013 | H2H |
| Daniela Hantuchova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 13, 2013 | H2H |