H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC

Kimiko Date vs Pam Shriver H2H: 3-0

Kimiko Date holds a 3–0 lead over Pam Shriver in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 1995 Eastbourne fourth round 7-5 6-2.

JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3 0
3 main draw meetings
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateTournamentCategoryRoundSurface
Kimiko Date #6 7-5 6-2 Pam Shriver #87 Match data Jun 23, 1995* Eastbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass
Kimiko Date #24 6-3 6-3 Pam Shriver #33 Match data Aug 27, 1992* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Carpet
Kimiko Date #90 6-4 6-3 Pam Shriver #19 Match data Jan 21, 1990* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,091 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 3 4 8
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 1 0 4 19 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kimiko Date Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% 1,838 0 1
16 1979 16–16 50.0% 1,813 0 1
17 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,055 0 2
18 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,139 0 4
19 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,099 0 5
20 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,725 0 0 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,164 0 8
21 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,061 0 10
22 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,948 0 2 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,119 0 14
23 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,197 0 16
24 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,028 0 5 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,256 0 20
25 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,076 0 7 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,198 0 24
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,961 0 24
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,700 0 24
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,636 0 24
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7
38 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8
39 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8
40 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8
41 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8
42 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8
43 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,598 0 8
44 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,574 0 8
46 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8