H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Klara Koukalova vs Emilie Loit H2H: 2-2

Klara Koukalova and Emilie Loit are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Emilie Loit leads 2–1 on clay, while Klara Koukalova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Klara Koukalova won the 2009 Acapulco round of 32 4-6 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Klara Koukalova
CZE Age 44 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Klara Koukalova #93 4-6 6-4 7-5 Emilie Loit #107 Match data Feb 26, 2009* R32 Acapulco International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Emilie Loit #108 6-4 6-3 Klara Koukalova #55 Match data May 28, 2008* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Klara Koukalova #85 7-5 3-1 (ret.) Emilie Loit #43 Match data Sep 27, 2007* R32 Luxembourg Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Emilie Loit #33 6-3 2-6 6-4 Klara Koukalova #78 Match data Apr 17, 2004* QF Estoril Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Klara Koukalova #566 #20 1,860 1,803 275 288 48.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,779 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Klara Koukalova Emilie Loit
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0
19 2001 5–4 55.6% #139 1,519 0 0 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,512 0 0
20 2002 4–5 44.4% #117 1,527 0 0 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0
21 2003 14–19 42.4% #63 1,537 0 0 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,457 0 0
22 2004 26–23 53.1% #46 1,611 0 0 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,547 0 0
23 2005 32–19 62.7% #35 1,764 0 2 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0
24 2006 10–22 31.2% #117 1,546 0 2 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0
25 2007 12–12 50.0% #63 1,578 0 2 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,668 0 2
26 2008 21–22 48.8% #72 1,574 0 2 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,548 0 2
27 2009 8–17 32.0% #90 1,533 0 2 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,622 0 2
28 2010 20–20 50.0% #41 1,656 0 2 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,618 0 3
29 2011 29–25 53.7% #41 1,713 0 2 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,518 0 3
30 2012 24–22 52.2% #28 1,721 0 2 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,533 0 3
31 2013 27–25 51.9% #35 1,675 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2014 29–27 51.8% #40 1,611 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2015 14–22 38.9% #99 1,549 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2016 0–4 0.0% #400 1,486 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Klara Koukalova Emilie Loit
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2001 — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2004 8 12 20 40.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2005 16 11 27 59.3% 11 6 17 64.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2006 4 11 15 26.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2007 5 7 12 41.7% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — 2004 6 11 17 35.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2008 6 9 15 40.0% 15 10 25 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 4 9 13 30.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2009 1 7 8 12.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2010 12 11 23 52.2% 5 8 13 38.5% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2011 16 15 31 51.6% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2012 8 12 20 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 2009 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
31 2013 17 16 33 51.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 18 17 35 51.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 5 14 19 26.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 119 154 273 43.6% 117 101 218 53.7% 32 24 56 57.1% 7 9 16 43.8% — 51 80 131 38.9% 94 72 166 56.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 7 14 21 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Klara Koukalova Emilie Loit
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1499 112.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22
19 2001 1520 104.0 — — — — — +55 — 47.8% +0.26 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +1.03 1998 1512 121.9 — — — — +45 +20 — 44.4% -0.11 0–2 0–1 — +0.24
20 2002 1527 105.4 — — — — — +71 — 50.0% -0.42 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — +0.68 1999 1424 101.4 — — — — +104 +28 — 26.2% -1.86 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.55
21 2003 1537 119.8 — — — — -60 +108 — 44.4% -0.35 7–8 (47%) 1–3 (25%) 99.1 +0.56 2000 1458 109.0 — — — — +67 +11 — 45.8% -0.12 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.50
22 2004 1612 117.6 — — — — -110 +85 +30 49.5% -0.07 8–7 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 103.5 +0.67 2001 1547 113.0 — — — — -32 -21 — 44.3% -0.61 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 +0.79
23 2005 1764 126.4 — — — — -90 +7 -18 55.5% +0.09 15–4 (79%) 9–2 (82%) 118.0 +1.13 2002 1626 113.6 — — — — -91 +30 — 52.4% -0.04 10–6 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 106.6 +0.19
24 2006 1547 107.1 — — — — +14 +77 +135 37.0% -1.05 2–7 (22%) 3–3 (50%) 92.0 +0.20 2003 1673 132.7 +2.59 +0.21 1.090 51.0% -71 +43 -104 49.1% -0.05 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 -1.57
25 2007 1579 115.5 — — — — -13 +59 — 50.0% +0.06 3–5 (38%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 +0.21 2004 1668 124.9 -0.94 -1.99 0.870 46.7% -119 +171 -41 59.8% +0.45 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.5 +1.06
26 2008 1574 111.3 — — — — -45 +84 — 48.5% -0.08 10–9 (53%) 3–5 (38%) 100.5 +0.48 2005 1549 112.1 -0.35 +0.26 1.107 52.4% -55 +179 — 48.8% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.9 +1.69
27 2009 1534 110.3 — — — — -72 +97 — 35.0% -0.95 5–5 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 100.5 -0.40 2006 1622 125.1 -1.55 +0.33 0.990 50.1% -86 +130 — 55.7% +0.60 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 +1.39
28 2010 1657 126.4 — — — — -49 -66 +4 46.2% -0.20 10–5 (67%) 5–6 (45%) 106.2 +0.89 2007 1619 129.8 -0.93 +0.96 1.001 50.0% -37 +141 — 55.4% +0.37 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 104.3 -0.20
29 2011 1713 131.7 — — — — -15 -60 -54 50.4% -0.03 13–6 (68%) 7–4 (64%) 109.2 +0.80 2008 1518 106.1 -4.05 -3.45 0.777 44.3% 0 +121 — 30.2% -1.60 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -0.27
30 2012 1721 128.0 — — — — -45 -9 -3 51.0% +0.17 10–6 (63%) 5–7 (42%) 103.3 -0.68 2009 1533 118.8 +0.06 -0.68 0.916 48.8% +33 +65 — 44.4% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.07
31 2013 1676 139.6 — — — — -9 +65 +31 51.7% +0.15 9–9 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 95.7 -1.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1612 127.9 -2.87 -0.03 0.906 47.8% +13 +61 +151 50.8% -0.13 10–8 (56%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1549 110.8 -2.79 +1.36 0.935 48.1% -28 +101 +170 40.5% -0.84 2–6 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 95.0 -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1486 101.6 -2.24 -1.27 0.765 45.0% -28 — — 27.3% -1.55 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1804 125.9 -2.79 +0.55 0.910 47.8% -34 +51 +56 47.9% -0.19 110–93 (54%) 67–62 (52%) 106.6 +0.50 — 1780 125.3 -1.16 -0.31 0.956 49.0% -44 +99 -67 49.4% -0.12 54–58 (48%) 34–43 (44%) 98.9 +1.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.