H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Klara Koukalova vs Melinda Czink H2H: 1-0
Klara Koukalova holds a 1–0 lead over Melinda Czink in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Klara Koukalova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Klara Koukalova won the 2009 Warsaw third round 3-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 44
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 43
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2009* | Warsaw | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Klara Koukalova | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Melinda Czink | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Klara Koukalova | #566 | #20 | 1,860 | 1,807 | 275 | 285 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Melinda Czink | #691 | #37 | 1,571 | 1,794 | 89 | 136 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Klara Koukalova | Melinda Czink | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2001 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #117 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #63 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–15 | 11.8% | #128 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #46 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #35 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #105 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #117 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #124 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,579 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #106 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,590 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2009 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #90 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #312 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2011 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #41 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #94 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #254 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #40 | 1,611 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,572 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,499 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |