H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Kristie Boogert vs Pam Shriver H2H: 1-1

Kristie Boogert and Pam Shriver are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kristie Boogert leads 1–0 on carpet, while Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kristie Boogert won the 1994 Tokyo Pan Pacific quarterfinal 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kristie Boogert
NED Age 52 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 5, 1994* Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 1000 QF Carpet Kristie Boogert #90 6-1 6-4 Pam Shriver #44 Match data
Jun 16, 1993* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Pam Shriver #34 6-4 6-2 Kristie Boogert #97 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kristie Boogert #564 #29 549 1,770 104 139 42.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kristie Boogert Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1
17 1991 0–4 0.0% #231 1,469 0 0 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2
18 1992 1–4 20.0% #168 1,450 0 0 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4
19 1993 8–15 34.8% #111 1,494 0 0 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5
20 1994 17–18 48.6% #53 1,591 0 0 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8
21 1995 22–16 57.9% #35 1,751 0 0 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1996 13–16 44.8% #55 1,713 0 0 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14
23 1997 6–10 37.5% #82 1,680 0 0 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16
24 1998 10–15 40.0% #83 1,615 0 0 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20
25 1999 9–12 42.9% #94 1,604 0 0 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24
26 2000 11–13 45.8% #66 1,623 0 0 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24
27 2001 4–11 26.7% #146 1,531 0 0 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24
28 2002 3–4 42.9% #141 1,537 0 0 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24
29 2003 0–1 0.0% #314 1,531 0 0 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24
30 — — — — — — — 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 — — — — — — — 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 — — — — — — — 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 — — — — — — — 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 — — — — — — — 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24