H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kristina Barrois vs Laura Pous-Tio H2H: 0-1

Laura Pous-Tio holds a 1–0 lead over Kristina Barrois in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Pous-Tio leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Pous-Tio won the 2011 Bad Gastein round of 16 7-6(6) 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kristina Barrois
GER Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Laura Pous-Tio
Spain Age 41 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Pous-Tio #94 7-6(6) 7-6(5) Kristina Barrois #86 Match data Jul 15, 2011* R16 Bad Gastein International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kristina Barrois #349 #57 1,066 1,701 34 59 36.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Laura Pous-Tio #776 #72 930 1,620 41 62 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kristina Barrois Laura Pous-Tio
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 2005 7–7 50.0% #90 1,542 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2006 6–14 30.0% #101 1,497 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2007 3–6 33.3% #165 1,465 0 0
24 2006 0–5 0.0% #119 1,450 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2007 1–3 25.0% #237 1,441 0 0 2010 6–6 50.0% #108 1,529 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2011 13–15 46.4% #75 1,589 0 0
27 2009 11–13 45.8% #78 1,541 0 0 2012 6–9 40.0% #157 1,545 0 0
28 2010 11–15 42.3% #79 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2011 11–14 44.0% #91 1,614 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2012 0–7 0.0% #255 1,521 0 0 2015 0–1 0.0% #194 1,531 0 0
31 2013 0–2 0.0% #223 1,494 0 0 2016 0–4 0.0% #287 1,427 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kristina Barrois Laura Pous-Tio
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
24 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2009 4 7 11 36.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2010 2 7 9 22.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1 5 6 16.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 7 28 35 20.0% 20 21 41 48.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — 4 19 23 17.4% 37 40 77 48.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 82/93 of Kristina Barrois's and 71/89 of Laura Pous-Tio's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kristina Barrois Laura Pous-Tio
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 12/20 1.1 3.2 65.7% 58.4% 48.6% 56.2% 41.7% 55.0% 43.2%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 6/9 1.3 5.2 58.3% 53.0% 43.7% 48.0% 63.9% 49.2% 46.9%
24 2006 3/5 4.3 2.0 71.6% 54.4% 44.9% 45.9% 33.3% 51.7% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 1/4 2.0 4.0 67.8% 49.2% 53.6% 40.0% 50.0% 50.6% 41.4% 2010 7/12 0.6 2.1 71.6% 57.1% 53.3% 52.3% 57.3% 55.3% 46.4%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 27/28 0.7 2.5 67.4% 55.1% 47.8% 54.8% 53.1% 52.8% 46.5%
27 2009 21/24 4.4 3.6 57.4% 68.1% 48.4% 53.3% 52.0% 59.5% 40.4% 2012 14/15 0.6 3.1 59.3% 61.5% 43.4% 55.3% 52.5% 54.0% 47.9%
28 2010 24/26 2.9 3.3 61.0% 62.6% 47.8% 57.3% 51.6% 57.0% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 24/25 2.3 3.1 64.0% 62.7% 45.3% 56.9% 42.0% 56.3% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 7/7 4.0 1.7 62.8% 61.3% 40.2% 50.0% 40.6% 53.3% 35.4% 2015 1/1 0.0 2.0 64.4% 51.1% 61.5% 37.5% 50.0% 54.8% 34.3%
31 2013 2/2 1.0 3.5 59.2% 57.5% 36.0% 54.4% 38.6% 48.7% 38.1% 2016 4/4 0.8 4.8 67.6% 54.9% 33.7% 40.6% 78.6% 48.2% 41.7%
Career — 82/93 3.2 3.1 61.5% 63.4% 46.3% 54.8% 46.9% 56.7% 40.1% — 71/103 0.8 3.0 65.1% 56.9% 46.7% 53.3% 53.8% 53.1% 45.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kristina Barrois Laura Pous-Tio
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1542 107.3 — — — — -41 +77 — 46.9% -0.56 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — -0.14
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1498 111.5 -0.72 -1.49 0.959 49.2% -43 +76 — 36.2% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 0–1 — -0.11
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1466 95.5 -3.89 -0.40 0.924 48.0% — +65 — 35.0% -0.80 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.71
24 2006 1450 107.6 -0.06 +1.31 0.823 45.9% +32 — — 23.1% -1.31 0–3 (0%) — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 1441 98.2 -1.14 -2.39 0.837 46.0% — +68 — 36.4% -1.18 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.02 2010 1530 117.0 -0.15 +1.25 1.039 51.0% — +51 — 53.3% +0.13 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.42
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1590 119.1 -2.29 +2.09 0.985 49.8% -126 +36 — 44.3% 0.00 4–3 (57%) 2–6 (25%) 100.5 -0.55
27 2009 1542 118.9 +2.56 -1.94 0.998 49.9% -53 +30 +71 45.3% 0.00 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) 99.3 +0.19 2012 1545 107.7 -1.22 -0.13 1.041 51.1% -104 +94 — 40.6% -0.56 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 94.8 +0.78
28 2010 1587 118.1 +0.43 -1.86 0.972 49.6% -115 +10 +64 45.0% -0.05 3–5 (38%) 3–3 (50%) 96.9 -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1615 119.7 +1.00 -2.59 0.909 48.3% -136 +26 -12 47.3% -0.53 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 97.7 -1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1521 101.7 -2.02 -4.21 0.758 44.8% -106 — — 12.5% -2.31 0–2 0–2 — -0.02 2015 1531 100.6 -1.68 -0.81 0.759 45.0% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.03
31 2013 1494 98.8 -1.84 -0.57 0.743 43.6% — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — +0.04 2016 1428 94.0 -2.86 -3.40 0.805 45.3% -10 — — 11.1% -2.22 0–1 — — +0.53
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1414 96.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1701 118.5 +0.84 -2.15 0.926 48.5% -87 +26 +49 40.8% -0.52 8–21 (28%) 11–15 (42%) 90.6 -1.91 — 1621 111.6 -1.76 +0.40 0.977 49.6% -75 +62 — 41.2% -0.42 13–20 (39%) 8–15 (35%) 91.7 +0.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.