H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kristina Brandi vs Kveta Peschke H2H: 0-1
Kveta Peschke holds a 1–0 lead over Kristina Brandi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kveta Peschke leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kveta Peschke won the 2006 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PUR
Age 49
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2006* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Kveta Peschke | 6-3 6-0 | Kristina Brandi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Brandi | #917 | #27 | 983 | 1,722 | 103 | 150 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kveta Peschke | #264 | #26 | 1,028 | 1,826 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristina Brandi | Kveta Peschke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #71 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #55 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #60 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #27 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #44 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2001 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #47 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #207 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #85 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #75 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #148 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #47 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #89 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2006 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #158 | 1,426 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #30 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,414 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #133 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |