H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Kristina Mladenovic vs Aleksandra Krunic H2H: 1-0
Kristina Mladenovic holds a 1–0 lead over Aleksandra Krunic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kristina Mladenovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kristina Mladenovic won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 33
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 33
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2016* | Rio de Janeiro Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Kristina Mladenovic | 6-1 6-4 | Aleksandra Krunic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Mladenovic | #395 | #10 | 3,155 | 1,929 | 213 | 234 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Aleksandra Krunic | #470 | #39 | 1,210 | 1,770 | 86 | 118 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristina Mladenovic | Aleksandra Krunic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #300 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #165 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #55 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #67 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #87 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #108 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #144 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #11 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #54 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2018 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #43 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #55 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2019 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #39 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #163 | 1,562 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2020 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #50 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #86 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #152 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,431 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #286 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #468 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |