H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Kristina Mladenovic vs Jie Zheng H2H: 0-1
Jie Zheng holds a 1–0 lead over Kristina Mladenovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jie Zheng leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jie Zheng won the 2013 Osaka fourth round 6-7(5) 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 33
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 43
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2013* | Osaka | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Jie Zheng | 6-7(5) 6-2 6-0 | Kristina Mladenovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Mladenovic | #395 | #10 | 3,155 | 1,926 | 212 | 232 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Jie Zheng | #961 | #15 | 2,745 | 1,898 | 216 | 193 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristina Mladenovic | Jie Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #300 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #55 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #67 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2015 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #33 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2016 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2017 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #11 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2018 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #43 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2019 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #39 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2020 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #50 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2021 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #26 | 1,658 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #152 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,432 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #962 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 |