H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Kristina Mladenovic vs Na Lae Han H2H: 2-0
Kristina Mladenovic holds a 2–0 lead over Na Lae Han in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kristina Mladenovic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kristina Mladenovic won the 2021 Seoul fourth round 6-4 5-7 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 33
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
KOR
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2021 | Seoul | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Kristina Mladenovic | 6-4 5-7 6-0 | Na Lae Han | Match data |
| Aug 5, 2021* | San Jose | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Kristina Mladenovic | 6-4 6-4 | Na Lae Han | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Mladenovic | #395 | #10 | 3,155 | 1,926 | 212 | 232 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Na Lae Han | #973 | #149 | 416 | 1,517 | 5 | 14 | 26.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kristina Mladenovic | Na Lae Han | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #300 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #257 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #256 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #55 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #67 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #11 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #43 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #39 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #50 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #152 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,432 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |