H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC

Kristina Mladenovic vs Timea Babos H2H: 4-4

Kristina Mladenovic and Timea Babos are tied 4–4 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Timea Babos leads 3–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Kristina Mladenovic won the 2018 Linz fourth round 6-4 4-6 7-5.

FRA Age 33 Right-Handed 184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 4
8 main draw meetings
HUN Age 33 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 12, 2018* Linz WTA 500 R16 Hard Kristina Mladenovic #48 6-4 4-6 7-5 Timea Babos #64 Match data
Aug 2, 2018* San Jose WTA 500 R32 Hard Timea Babos #38 6-4 6-2 Kristina Mladenovic #57 Match data
Aug 23, 2017* New Haven WTA 500 R32 Hard Timea Babos #66 7-5 7-5 Kristina Mladenovic #14 Match data
Oct 19, 2016 Moscow WTA 500 R16 Hard Timea Babos #26 6-1 6-4 Kristina Mladenovic #42 Match data
May 26, 2016* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Kristina Mladenovic #30 6-4 6-3 Timea Babos #45 Match data
Jun 11, 2015* 's Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R32 Grass Kristina Mladenovic #43 7-6(4) 4-6 6-2 Timea Babos #91 Match data
May 2, 2015* Marrakech WTA 250 SF Clay Timea Babos #86 6-4 6-4 Kristina Mladenovic #59 Match data
Jan 16, 2013* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Kristina Mladenovic #98 6-3 4-6 11-9 Timea Babos #73 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kristina Mladenovic #395 #10 3,155 1,926 212 232 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Timea Babos #453 #25 1,675 1,768 123 177 41.0% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kristina Mladenovic Timea Babos
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2009 0–4 0.0% #202 1,451 0 0
17 2010 1–2 33.3% #300 1,460 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #268 1,491 0 0
18 2011 0–1 0.0% #141 1,451 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #154 1,503 0 0
19 2012 5–5 50.0% #96 1,512 0 0 2012 13–14 48.1% #67 1,553 0 1
20 2013 21–25 45.7% #55 1,550 0 0 2013 9–16 36.0% #88 1,540 0 1
21 2014 15–23 39.5% #67 1,599 0 0 2014 4–11 26.7% #99 1,482 0 1
22 2015 35–25 58.3% #29 1,733 0 0 2015 12–21 36.4% #70 1,564 0 1
23 2016 25–25 50.0% #42 1,720 0 0 2016 35–27 56.5% #28 1,712 0 1
24 2017 34–25 57.6% #11 1,652 0 1 2017 20–26 43.5% #57 1,637 0 2
25 2018 18–26 40.9% #43 1,656 0 1 2018 19–23 45.2% #59 1,614 0 3
26 2019 27–23 54.0% #39 1,790 0 1 2019 6–16 27.3% #89 1,595 0 3
27 2020 4–9 30.8% #50 1,717 0 1 2020 0–6 0.0% #115 1,542 0 3
28 2021 20–23 46.5% #86 1,672 0 1 2021 3–9 25.0% #160 1,497 0 3
29 2022 7–10 41.2% #152 1,561 0 1 2022 0–1 0.0% #336 1,455 0 3
30 2023 0–4 0.0% #239 1,432 0 1 2023 1–3 25.0% #188 1,480 0 3
31 2024 0–2 0.0% #210 1,442 0 1 2024 0–2 0.0% #338 1,451 0 3