H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kristy Pigeon vs Tory Ann Fretz H2H: 1-2
Tory Ann Fretz holds a 2–1 lead over Kristy Pigeon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tory Ann Fretz leads 1–0 on carpet, while Kristy Pigeon leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tory Ann Fretz won the 1969 San Juan fourth round 6-0 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 1969* | San Juan | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Tory Ann Fretz | 6-0 7-5 | Kristy Pigeon | Match data |
| Feb 24, 1969* | Boston | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Tory Ann Fretz | 6-2 6-3 | Kristy Pigeon | Match data |
| Aug 3, 1968* | South Orange | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Kristy Pigeon | 6-4 1-6 7-5 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristy Pigeon | — | — | — | 1,821 | 112 | 95 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Tory Ann Fretz | — | — | — | 1,802 | 104 | 102 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristy Pigeon | Tory Ann Fretz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 15–26 | 36.6% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,706 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1974 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 28–14 | 66.7% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 10–20 | 33.3% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |