H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kristyna Pliskova vs Kaia Kanepi H2H: 0-1

Kaia Kanepi holds a 1–0 lead over Kristyna Pliskova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kaia Kanepi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kaia Kanepi won the 2014 Korea Open round of 16 3-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kristyna Pliskova
Czech Republic Age 34 Left-Handed 184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Kaia Kanepi
Estonia Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kristyna Pliskova #85 7-6(1) 6-2 Kaia Kanepi #79 Match data May 4, 2019 Q2 Q Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Kaia Kanepi #45 3-6 6-3 6-2 Kristyna Pliskova #97 Match data Sep 19, 2014* R16 Korea Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kristyna Pliskova #446 #35 1,343 1,755 92 139 39.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kaia Kanepi #1,322 #15 2,760 1,908 264 236 52.8% 0 0 0 2 2 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kristyna Pliskova Kaia Kanepi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #854 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2008 0–1 0.0% #748 1,477 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #200 1,496 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 2–3 40.0% #285 1,498 0 0
18 2010 0–2 0.0% #222 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2011 2–5 28.6% #176 1,467 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #229 1,484 0 0
20 2012 3–3 50.0% #104 1,505 0 0 2005 3–2 60.0% #98 1,527 0 0
21 2013 3–10 23.1% #130 1,451 0 0 2006 14–16 46.7% #78 1,606 0 0
22 2014 3–10 23.1% #121 1,424 0 0 2007 13–17 43.3% #75 1,581 0 0
23 2015 2–4 33.3% #117 1,435 0 0 2008 30–21 58.8% #27 1,761 0 0
24 2016 10–14 41.7% #60 1,590 0 1 2009 15–21 41.7% #58 1,603 0 0
25 2017 23–23 50.0% #62 1,626 0 1 2010 29–17 63.0% #22 1,842 0 1
26 2018 14–22 38.9% #94 1,627 0 1 2011 19–17 52.8% #34 1,798 0 1
27 2019 18–21 46.2% #67 1,659 0 1 2012 25–9 73.5% #19 1,861 0 3
28 2020 9–8 52.9% #69 1,667 0 1 2013 21–10 67.7% #30 1,838 0 4
29 2021 5–15 25.0% #146 1,592 0 1 2014 17–19 47.2% #51 1,719 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2015 8–12 40.0% #122 1,659 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2016 0–1 0.0% #376 1,663 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2017 4–2 66.7% #100 1,731 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2018 12–12 50.0% #61 1,776 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2019 9–9 50.0% #101 1,761 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2020 2–3 40.0% #93 1,729 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2021 11–12 47.8% #73 1,699 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2022 24–16 60.0% #32 1,802 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2023 6–15 28.6% #168 1,627 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kristyna Pliskova Kaia Kanepi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2005 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2006 8 8 16 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2014 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 4 6 10 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2015 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2008 19 12 31 61.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2009 9 13 22 40.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2017 13 15 28 46.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
26 2018 4 11 15 26.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2011 14 9 23 60.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
27 2019 9 10 19 47.4% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2012 13 6 19 68.4% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2020 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 2021 1 7 8 12.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2014 12 12 24 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 9 6 15 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 10 8 18 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 49 77 126 38.9% 32 40 72 44.4% 11 22 33 33.3% — — — — — 156 134 290 53.8% 88 76 164 53.7% 16 24 40 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 225/232 of Kristyna Pliskova's and 427/488 of Kaia Kanepi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kristyna Pliskova Kaia Kanepi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2007 1/1 1.0 4.0 66.1% 59.5% 15.8% 37.5% — 44.6% 23.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 1/1 0.0 4.0 58.1% 36.0% 27.8% 33.3% 100.0% 32.6% 25.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 2/2 3.5 3.0 61.9% 65.9% 33.8% 26.7% 14.3% 53.2% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 7/7 3.9 4.4 57.9% 61.0% 39.8% 55.0% 49.4% 52.2% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 5/6 3.8 3.0 61.4% 67.7% 50.8% 69.0% 45.1% 60.8% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 12/13 5.9 3.8 57.6% 65.7% 47.6% 61.8% 26.7% 57.7% 36.0% 2006 5/30 3.2 3.6 50.1% 63.5% 51.7% 55.9% 43.1% 57.7% 43.7%
22 2014 13/13 8.7 4.2 53.8% 70.0% 48.4% 43.9% 46.2% 60.1% 36.0% 2007 21/30 3.0 7.0 57.0% 65.6% 38.7% 49.4% 52.0% 54.0% 42.6%
23 2015 4/6 9.0 5.5 60.6% 72.5% 42.8% 51.4% 43.3% 60.9% 39.4% 2008 37/51 2.4 5.1 58.3% 64.6% 45.9% 53.8% 50.1% 56.9% 45.8%
24 2016 24/25 11.4 4.5 56.7% 73.6% 46.6% 56.4% 50.6% 61.9% 39.1% 2009 35/36 3.1 5.3 52.3% 64.9% 42.8% 47.9% 52.3% 54.2% 43.8%
25 2017 45/46 8.2 3.8 57.7% 72.0% 47.1% 53.8% 46.9% 61.6% 40.4% 2010 42/46 3.7 5.1 59.4% 68.5% 44.9% 53.1% 44.3% 59.0% 47.2%
26 2018 35/36 7.5 3.5 57.3% 70.5% 43.0% 50.6% 45.1% 58.7% 38.6% 2011 35/36 4.4 4.3 57.1% 67.9% 44.3% 58.6% 44.1% 57.8% 44.4%
27 2019 39/39 8.6 4.2 59.6% 73.0% 44.9% 63.1% 37.5% 61.7% 38.3% 2012 34/34 4.0 4.7 57.0% 70.7% 48.0% 55.5% 51.0% 61.0% 47.8%
28 2020 17/17 8.1 3.4 60.8% 72.2% 44.6% 63.9% 44.2% 61.3% 37.8% 2013 30/31 4.1 4.5 55.7% 69.5% 47.3% 59.5% 45.7% 59.5% 43.9%
29 2021 20/20 8.0 4.5 60.6% 72.4% 38.9% 53.6% 49.2% 59.2% 35.5% 2014 36/36 4.1 5.5 55.7% 65.5% 43.2% 50.9% 45.3% 55.4% 43.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 18/20 3.5 4.7 55.8% 66.6% 45.7% 55.4% 59.7% 57.3% 41.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 1/1 1.0 4.0 65.3% 65.6% 11.8% 16.7% 100.0% 46.9% 38.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 6/6 2.0 2.7 71.5% 61.5% 44.5% 61.3% 43.3% 56.5% 42.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 22/24 2.6 4.5 59.6% 64.2% 47.7% 53.3% 45.4% 57.7% 44.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 18/18 3.5 4.7 58.4% 66.1% 42.5% 47.5% 39.9% 56.0% 44.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 5/5 3.6 3.2 58.7% 62.0% 47.8% 41.4% 49.8% 56.5% 45.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 22/23 3.7 4.6 51.7% 65.7% 46.8% 49.5% 54.1% 56.4% 41.5%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 39/40 4.6 3.7 55.9% 68.5% 49.0% 49.4% 45.1% 59.7% 43.1%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 21/21 2.5 3.1 57.0% 66.2% 46.9% 46.5% 42.8% 57.7% 40.7%
Career — 225/232 8.0 4.0 58.3% 71.0% 44.7% 55.7% 44.0% 60.1% 38.2% — 427/500 3.6 4.7 56.7% 66.8% 45.4% 52.4% 47.7% 57.5% 44.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kristyna Pliskova Kaia Kanepi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2007 1491 94.2 +1.05 -0.51 0.428 36.2% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 1478 93.8 -0.69 -2.03 0.381 29.5% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — 0.00 2001 1497 105.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.28
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1498 103.4 — — — — — +23 — 40.0% -0.90 — — — +0.03
18 2010 1468 107.5 +1.73 +0.32 0.814 45.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 1468 105.0 -1.40 -3.28 0.804 45.8% +57 +18 — 31.3% -1.25 1–1 0–2 — -0.06 2004 1485 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.19
20 2012 1505 115.6 +0.04 -1.09 1.028 50.7% +33 — — 53.8% +1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.14 2005 1527 114.1 — — — — +28 — — 54.5% +0.18 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.08
21 2013 1452 99.6 +0.13 -4.56 0.853 47.0% +58 -9 +81 30.0% -1.27 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.3 +0.60 2006 1607 113.9 +0.07 -1.13 1.033 50.5% +4 -62 — 47.9% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.1 +0.19
22 2014 1424 111.3 +1.65 -4.96 0.903 48.0% +56 — — 38.2% -0.68 1–7 (13%) 5–0 (100%) 98.1 +0.03 2007 1581 120.1 -1.50 -0.76 0.926 48.4% +17 +20 -16 46.5% -0.18 4–7 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 96.3 +0.10
23 2015 1435 104.1 +0.60 -0.65 1.008 49.2% +12 — +157 41.2% -0.53 2–3 (40%) — — +0.17 2008 1761 142.2 +1.74 +1.87 1.063 51.4% -2 -50 — 55.6% +0.40 13–9 (59%) 9–4 (69%) 107.7 +0.04
24 2016 1590 115.8 +2.97 -3.47 1.026 50.3% +37 -203 — 46.7% -0.15 4–10 (29%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 +0.63 2009 1604 134.2 -0.69 +1.03 0.958 49.2% +69 +58 — 45.0% -0.20 4–8 (33%) 0–7 (0%) 89.0 +0.79
25 2017 1627 130.8 +3.78 -2.74 1.051 50.6% +3 -136 -51 51.9% +0.07 8–12 (40%) 12–10 (55%) 99.9 -0.48 2010 1842 146.9 +2.60 +3.18 1.151 53.0% -58 -100 -165 63.4% +0.93 3–8 (27%) 9–3 (75%) 101.4 -1.00
26 2018 1628 130.1 +2.09 -3.62 0.935 48.6% -30 +55 -112 43.5% -0.39 4–9 (31%) 5–7 (42%) 95.2 -2.37 2011 1799 142.9 +1.95 +1.23 1.051 51.0% +49 -115 -218 50.6% +0.20 8–7 (53%) 3–6 (33%) 97.9 +0.49
27 2019 1660 121.0 +4.09 -3.86 1.001 50.0% -45 -4 -44 47.8% -0.08 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 97.6 +1.67 2012 1862 140.4 +3.77 +2.86 1.226 54.3% -34 -10 — 67.5% +1.30 7–2 (78%) 3–2 (60%) 104.5 +0.29
28 2020 1667 130.6 +2.84 -2.53 0.976 49.9% -74 +61 — 54.1% +0.22 1–4 (20%) 0–2 — +0.25 2013 1838 132.3 +2.40 +0.55 1.085 51.8% -37 +75 -164 62.9% +0.74 6–2 (75%) 7–2 (78%) 106.6 +0.19
29 2021 1592 119.5 +1.14 -5.56 0.869 47.5% -32 +85 +4 34.0% -0.89 1–6 (14%) 3–7 (30%) 91.5 +0.09 2014 1719 134.8 +0.25 +0.12 0.969 49.5% +38 +81 -56 48.9% -0.16 7–9 (44%) 9–4 (69%) 97.8 -0.89
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1659 126.5 -0.20 +0.50 0.961 49.3% +51 +100 — 47.5% -0.15 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.35
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1663 113.1 +1.02 -0.64 0.730 42.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.02
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1732 125.4 -0.85 +0.35 0.969 49.3% +33 — — 57.1% -0.14 2–0 — — +0.38
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1777 140.3 +1.23 +0.94 1.059 51.2% +67 -33 -156 54.7% +0.21 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 93.5 -0.34
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1762 130.8 -0.84 +2.11 1.014 50.2% +14 +32 — 48.9% 0.00 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 102.0 -0.46
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1729 113.7 +0.66 +1.49 1.042 51.0% +2 — — 41.7% +0.17 1–1 0–2 — -0.21
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1700 135.8 +0.07 -0.08 0.950 49.1% +53 +14 — 44.0% -0.34 4–2 (67%) 2–5 (29%) 99.7 -1.55
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1802 144.9 +2.41 +0.90 1.071 51.2% +48 +6 -236 54.7% +0.25 11–8 (58%) 6–7 (46%) 100.8 -0.84
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1627 124.3 +1.07 -1.99 0.962 49.0% +69 +54 — 38.0% -0.72 1–7 (13%) 2–8 (20%) 87.2 -0.08
Career — 1756 126.3 +2.51 -3.51 0.958 49.1% -1 +3 -10 44.2% -0.34 28–65 (30%) 37–39 (49%) 90.1 +0.07 — 1909 143.0 +1.22 +1.05 1.039 50.8% +24 +4 -153 52.4% +0.17 85–88 (49%) 63–63 (50%) 96.4 -0.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.