H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kveta Peschke vs Anke Huber H2H: 0-1
Anke Huber holds a 1–0 lead over Kveta Peschke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anke Huber leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 2000 Sopot quarterfinal 6-7(5) 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2000* | Sopot | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Anke Huber | 6-7(5) 6-1 6-1 | Kveta Peschke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kveta Peschke | #264 | #26 | 1,028 | 1,826 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kveta Peschke | Anke Huber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1998 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #60 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 1999 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #44 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2000 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #47 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 2001 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #85 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #148 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #30 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #133 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |