H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Kveta Peschke vs Barbara Rittner H2H: 2-1
Kveta Peschke holds a 2–1 lead over Barbara Rittner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kveta Peschke leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Kveta Peschke won the 1999 Roland Garros second round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1999* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Kveta Peschke | 6-4 7-6(5) | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
| May 12, 1999* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Barbara Rittner | 6-3 6-3 | Kveta Peschke | Match data |
| Apr 7, 1999* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Kveta Peschke | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kveta Peschke | #264 | #26 | 1,028 | 1,826 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Barbara Rittner | #438 | #24 | 661 | 1,883 | 209 | 217 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kveta Peschke | Barbara Rittner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #60 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #44 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #47 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #85 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #66 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #148 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #68 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2005 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #30 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #66 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2006 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #133 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |