H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kveta Peschke vs Cara Black H2H: 2-0
Kveta Peschke holds a 2–0 lead over Cara Black in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kveta Peschke leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kveta Peschke won the 2001 Hamburg third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ZIM
Age 47
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2001* | Hamburg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Kveta Peschke | 6-2 6-3 | Cara Black | Match data |
| Oct 22, 1999* | Bratislava | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Kveta Peschke | 6-1 6-4 | Cara Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kveta Peschke | #264 | #26 | 1,028 | 1,826 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Cara Black | #679 | #31 | 869 | 1,770 | 114 | 149 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kveta Peschke | Cara Black | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #50 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #60 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #58 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #44 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #56 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #47 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #85 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #138 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #148 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,491 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #30 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2006 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #133 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |