H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Kveta Peschke vs Daja Bedanova H2H: 2-1
Kveta Peschke holds a 2–1 lead over Daja Bedanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Kveta Peschke leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Daja Bedanova won the 2005 Indian Wells first round 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 43
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2005* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Daja Bedanova | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Kveta Peschke | Match data |
| Sep 26, 2002* | Leipzig | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Kveta Peschke | 6-2 2-1 (ret.) | Daja Bedanova | Match data |
| Aug 22, 2001* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Kveta Peschke | 1-6 6-3 6-2 | Daja Bedanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kveta Peschke | #264 | #26 | 1,028 | 1,826 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Daja Bedanova | #998 | #16 | 1,323 | 1,801 | 64 | 71 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kveta Peschke | Daja Bedanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #295 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #28 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #37 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #155 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #60 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #295 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #44 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2000 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #47 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2001 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #85 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #148 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #30 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #133 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |