H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kveta Peschke vs Daja Bedanova H2H: 2-1

Kveta Peschke holds a 2–1 lead over Daja Bedanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Kveta Peschke leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Daja Bedanova won the 2005 Indian Wells Open round of 128 6-3 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kveta Peschke
CZE Age 51 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Daja Bedanova
CZE Age 43 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daja Bedanova #430 6-3 3-6 6-3 Kveta Peschke #83 Match data Mar 8, 2005* R128 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Kveta Peschke #119 6-2 2-1 (ret.) Daja Bedanova #28 Match data Sep 26, 2002* R32 Leipzig Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Kveta Peschke #69 1-6 6-3 6-2 Daja Bedanova #40 Match data Aug 22, 2001* R32 New Haven Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kveta Peschke #264 #26 1,028 1,806 92 116 44.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Daja Bedanova #998 #16 1,323 1,806 65 72 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kveta Peschke Daja Bedanova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1999 1–1 50.0% #295 1,522 0 0
17 1993 1–2 33.3% #237 1,510 0 0 2000 13–9 59.1% #53 1,698 0 1
18 1994 0–1 0.0% #222 1,507 0 0 2001 20–20 50.0% #28 1,772 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 2002 24–25 49.0% #37 1,718 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 2003 6–15 28.6% #155 1,597 0 1
22 1998 10–11 47.6% #60 1,568 0 1 2005 1–2 33.3% #295 1,600 0 1
23 1999 13–18 41.9% #44 1,703 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2000 18–16 52.9% #47 1,790 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 2001 13–16 44.8% #85 1,710 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2002 5–9 35.7% #148 1,673 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2004 3–3 50.0% #93 1,675 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2005 21–19 52.5% #30 1,769 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2006 7–20 25.9% #133 1,594 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2007 1–1 50.0% #264 1,600 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kveta Peschke Daja Bedanova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1993 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1998 1 4 5 20.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 6 7 13 46.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 9 8 17 52.9% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2002 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 12 13 25 48.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 4 11 15 26.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 57 98 41.8% 31 33 64 48.4% 7 11 18 38.9% 13 15 28 46.4% — 45 41 86 52.3% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kveta Peschke Daja Bedanova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1522 117.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.06
17 1993 1510 110.8 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 — — -0.41 2000 1698 131.5 — — — — +23 — — 51.9% +0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 110.6 +0.15
18 1994 1508 108.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17 2001 1772 151.8 — — — — +15 -200 -253 50.5% +0.27 9–8 (53%) 3–11 (21%) 96.7 -2.29
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1718 137.2 — — — — -23 -139 -7 49.1% -0.08 10–10 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 98.1 -0.10
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1597 114.3 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +21 -39 +82 33.3% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.74
22 1998 1568 122.5 — — — — -52 +106 — 48.1% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 100.6 +0.78 2005 1600 108.4 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 — -0.49
23 1999 1704 141.0 — — — — -52 -7 — 42.9% -0.50 6–4 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 107.3 -0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 1791 137.4 — — — — -59 -53 — 49.4% -0.48 8–3 (73%) 4–3 (57%) 107.0 -2.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 1711 130.0 — — — — +7 -42 — 45.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 96.6 -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2002 1674 121.8 — — — — +8 — -162 39.4% -0.39 2–5 (29%) — — -1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 1675 115.7 +1.25 +0.61 1.094 51.2% +20 -45 — 50.0% +0.36 1–1 1–1 — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1770 145.7 +0.02 +2.42 1.095 52.3% -32 -63 -203 54.8% +0.31 4–9 (31%) 6–3 (67%) 97.6 -2.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1595 110.3 -4.62 -1.44 0.822 45.7% -4 +15 +34 35.1% -1.07 1–6 (14%) 1–4 (20%) 91.9 +1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1601 103.8 -0.67 +2.50 0.908 47.7% — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1806 139.1 -2.95 -0.18 0.901 47.7% -26 -3 -117 46.1% -0.32 34–40 (46%) 18–22 (45%) 98.4 -2.90 — 1807 141.8 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +4 -107 -36 47.3% -0.15 30–25 (55%) 12–20 (38%) 100.2 -2.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.