H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kveta Peschke vs Fang Li H2H: 1-0

Kveta Peschke holds a 1–0 lead over Fang Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kveta Peschke leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kveta Peschke won the 1998 Makarska final 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kveta Peschke
CZE Age 51 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Fang Li
CHN Age 53 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kveta Peschke #140 6-3 6-1 Fang Li #49 Match data Apr 19, 1998* F Makarska Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kveta Peschke #264 #26 1,028 1,806 92 116 44.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Fang Li #488 #36 723 1,707 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kveta Peschke Fang Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1993 1–2 33.3% #237 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1994 0–1 0.0% #222 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — 1992 5–8 38.5% #119 1,543 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1993 6–12 33.3% #132 1,529 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1994 13–13 50.0% #67 1,608 0 0
22 1998 10–11 47.6% #60 1,568 0 1 1995 9–8 52.9% #93 1,622 0 0
23 1999 13–18 41.9% #44 1,703 0 1 1996 3–5 37.5% #199 1,591 0 0
24 2000 18–16 52.9% #47 1,790 0 1 1997 2–3 40.0% #69 1,599 0 0
25 2001 13–16 44.8% #85 1,710 0 1 1998 23–24 48.9% #40 1,676 0 0
26 2002 5–9 35.7% #148 1,673 0 1 1999 6–12 33.3% #86 1,585 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2000 0–2 0.0% #503 1,542 0 0
28 2004 3–3 50.0% #93 1,675 0 1 2001 0–3 0.0% #488 1,500 0 0
29 2005 21–19 52.5% #30 1,769 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2006 7–20 25.9% #133 1,594 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2007 1–1 50.0% #264 1,600 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kveta Peschke Fang Li
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1993 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1998 1 4 5 20.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1996 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2000 6 7 13 46.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2001 9 8 17 52.9% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1998 12 12 24 50.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2002 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2001 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2005 12 13 25 48.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 4 11 15 26.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 57 98 41.8% 31 33 64 48.4% 7 11 18 38.9% 13 15 28 46.4% — 46 55 101 45.5% 17 21 38 44.7% 1 7 8 12.5% 3 7 10 30.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kveta Peschke Fang Li
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1993 1510 110.8 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 — — -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 1508 108.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1544 119.3 — — — — +55 — — 39.3% -0.68 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.13
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1529 112.6 — — — — +30 +31 — 33.3% -1.36 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.54
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1609 120.8 — — — — -10 +8 — 49.2% -0.22 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 +0.90
22 1998 1568 122.5 — — — — -52 +106 — 48.1% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 100.6 +0.78 1995 1623 122.6 — — — — -4 — — 55.3% +0.32 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.34
23 1999 1704 141.0 — — — — -52 -7 — 42.9% -0.50 6–4 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 107.3 -0.83 1996 1592 112.9 — — — — +22 — — 38.1% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.31
24 2000 1791 137.4 — — — — -59 -53 — 49.4% -0.48 8–3 (73%) 4–3 (57%) 107.0 -2.20 1997 1600 118.4 — — — — +20 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.54
25 2001 1711 130.0 — — — — +7 -42 — 45.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 96.6 -1.12 1998 1676 134.1 — — — — +38 -58 — 49.0% -0.06 6–4 (60%) 6–2 (75%) 107.9 +1.15
26 2002 1674 121.8 — — — — +8 — -162 39.4% -0.39 2–5 (29%) — — -1.13 1999 1586 117.9 — — — — +101 -16 — 37.8% -0.59 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.9 -0.13
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1542 89.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — +0.39
28 2004 1675 115.7 +1.25 +0.61 1.094 51.2% +20 -45 — 50.0% +0.36 1–1 1–1 — -0.08 2001 1500 92.6 — — — — +80 — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — 0.00
29 2005 1770 145.7 +0.02 +2.42 1.095 52.3% -32 -63 -203 54.8% +0.31 4–9 (31%) 6–3 (67%) 97.6 -2.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1595 110.3 -4.62 -1.44 0.822 45.7% -4 +15 +34 35.1% -1.07 1–6 (14%) 1–4 (20%) 91.9 +1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1601 103.8 -0.67 +2.50 0.908 47.7% — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1806 139.1 -2.95 -0.18 0.901 47.7% -26 -3 -117 46.1% -0.32 34–40 (46%) 18–22 (45%) 98.4 -2.90 — 1707 127.8 — — — — +28 -30 — 44.1% -0.42 22–21 (51%) 14–15 (48%) 100.5 +1.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.