H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kveta Peschke vs Janette Husarova H2H: 1-0
Kveta Peschke holds a 1–0 lead over Janette Husarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kveta Peschke leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kveta Peschke won the 2000 Moscow third round 4-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 52
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2000* | Moscow | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Kveta Peschke | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Janette Husarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kveta Peschke | #264 | #26 | 1,028 | 1,826 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Janette Husarova | #1,055 | #31 | 1,006 | 1,737 | 79 | 109 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kveta Peschke | Janette Husarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #82 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #145 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #60 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #44 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #375 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #47 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #127 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #85 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #148 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #149 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2005 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #30 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #126 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2006 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #133 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #366 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |