H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kveta Peschke vs Laurence Courtois H2H: 1-0
Kveta Peschke holds a 1–0 lead over Laurence Courtois in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kveta Peschke leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kveta Peschke won the 2000 Gold Coast third round 2-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 50
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2000* | Gold Coast | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Kveta Peschke | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | Laurence Courtois | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kveta Peschke | #264 | #26 | 1,028 | 1,826 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Laurence Courtois | #484 | #37 | 565 | 1,719 | 74 | 93 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kveta Peschke | Laurence Courtois | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #105 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #44 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #183 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #60 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #125 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #44 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #47 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #85 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #148 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #30 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #133 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |