H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kveta Peschke vs Laurence Courtois H2H: 1-0

Kveta Peschke holds a 1–0 lead over Laurence Courtois in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kveta Peschke leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kveta Peschke won the 2000 Gold Coast round of 32 2-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kveta Peschke
CZE Age 51 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Laurence Courtois
BEL Age 50 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kveta Peschke #44 2-6 6-3 6-2 Laurence Courtois #78 Match data Jan 6, 2000* R32 Gold Coast Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kveta Peschke #264 #26 1,028 1,806 92 116 44.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Laurence Courtois #484 #37 565 1,701 75 94 44.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kveta Peschke Laurence Courtois
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1993 1–2 33.3% #237 1,510 0 0 1993 3–3 50.0% #104 1,520 0 0
18 1994 0–1 0.0% #222 1,507 0 0 1994 8–13 38.1% #105 1,545 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1995 14–14 50.0% #64 1,624 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1996 20–16 55.6% #44 1,697 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1997 4–9 30.8% #183 1,647 0 0
22 1998 10–11 47.6% #60 1,568 0 1 1998 4–9 30.8% #125 1,578 0 0
23 1999 13–18 41.9% #44 1,703 0 1 1999 13–17 43.3% #78 1,546 0 0
24 2000 18–16 52.9% #47 1,790 0 1 2000 6–10 37.5% #130 1,538 0 0
25 2001 13–16 44.8% #85 1,710 0 1 2001 3–3 50.0% #166 1,540 0 0
26 2002 5–9 35.7% #148 1,673 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2004 3–3 50.0% #93 1,675 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2005 21–19 52.5% #30 1,769 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2006 7–20 25.9% #133 1,594 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2007 1–1 50.0% #264 1,600 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kveta Peschke Laurence Courtois
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1993 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
18 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 9 7 16 56.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1998 1 4 5 20.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1999 5 7 12 41.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2000 6 7 13 46.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2001 9 8 17 52.9% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 2001 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2002 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 12 13 25 48.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 4 11 15 26.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 57 98 41.8% 31 33 64 48.4% 7 11 18 38.9% 13 15 28 46.4% — 22 31 53 41.5% 32 37 69 46.4% 9 11 20 45.0% 12 15 27 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kveta Peschke Laurence Courtois
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1993 1510 110.8 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 — — -0.41 1993 1521 107.7 — — — — +38 +20 — 53.3% +0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 96.9 +0.37
18 1994 1508 108.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17 1994 1545 117.7 — — — — +33 +35 — 40.0% -1.20 4–4 (50%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.11
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1625 121.6 — — — — -31 -14 -24 50.0% -0.24 3–3 (50%) 8–3 (73%) 105.7 +0.28
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1698 120.0 — — — — -38 -71 -19 50.0% -0.11 11–5 (69%) 5–2 (71%) 109.5 +1.19
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1648 109.2 — — — — +21 -63 — 37.0% -1.26 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.6 +0.08
22 1998 1568 122.5 — — — — -52 +106 — 48.1% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 100.6 +0.78 1998 1579 117.9 — — — — +32 -27 — 41.9% -0.13 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — +0.02
23 1999 1704 141.0 — — — — -52 -7 — 42.9% -0.50 6–4 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 107.3 -0.83 1999 1546 109.3 — — — — +1 +26 +89 45.2% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 3–5 (38%) 97.3 +1.88
24 2000 1791 137.4 — — — — -59 -53 — 49.4% -0.48 8–3 (73%) 4–3 (57%) 107.0 -2.20 2000 1539 113.0 — — — — — +52 — 40.0% -0.27 4–4 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 95.8 -0.15
25 2001 1711 130.0 — — — — +7 -42 — 45.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 96.6 -1.12 2001 1540 100.3 — — — — — +39 — 47.1% -0.18 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 +0.63
26 2002 1674 121.8 — — — — +8 — -162 39.4% -0.39 2–5 (29%) — — -1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 1675 115.7 +1.25 +0.61 1.094 51.2% +20 -45 — 50.0% +0.36 1–1 1–1 — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1770 145.7 +0.02 +2.42 1.095 52.3% -32 -63 -203 54.8% +0.31 4–9 (31%) 6–3 (67%) 97.6 -2.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1595 110.3 -4.62 -1.44 0.822 45.7% -4 +15 +34 35.1% -1.07 1–6 (14%) 1–4 (20%) 91.9 +1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1601 103.8 -0.67 +2.50 0.908 47.7% — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1806 139.1 -2.95 -0.18 0.901 47.7% -26 -3 -117 46.1% -0.32 34–40 (46%) 18–22 (45%) 98.4 -2.90 — 1701 119.8 — — — — -4 +2 +6 45.3% -0.37 33–34 (49%) 26–23 (53%) 102.4 +2.66

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.