H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Kveta Peschke vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 0-2
Natasha Zvereva holds a 2–0 lead over Kveta Peschke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 2000 Klagenfurt third round 5-7 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 55
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2000* | Klagenfurt | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Natasha Zvereva | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | Kveta Peschke | Match data |
| Mar 31, 1999* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Natasha Zvereva | 7-5 6-1 | Kveta Peschke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kveta Peschke | #264 | #26 | 1,028 | 1,826 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Natasha Zvereva | #201 | #5 | 1,820 | 2,073 | 388 | 232 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kveta Peschke | Natasha Zvereva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #94 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #27 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #21 | 1,912 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #23 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1998 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #60 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #19 | 1,972 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1999 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #44 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 1,978 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2000 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #47 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #14 | 1,971 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2001 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #85 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #57 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #148 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #27 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2005 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #30 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #78 | 1,759 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2006 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #133 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 5 |