H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kveta Peschke vs Rita Kuti-Kis H2H: 2-0
Kveta Peschke holds a 2–0 lead over Rita Kuti-Kis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kveta Peschke leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kveta Peschke won the 2000 Berlin third round 7-6(3) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 48
Left-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2000* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Kveta Peschke | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Rita Kuti-Kis | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Kveta Peschke | 7-6(2) 6-7(5) 6-3 | Rita Kuti-Kis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kveta Peschke | #264 | #26 | 1,028 | 1,826 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Rita Kuti-Kis | #1,325 | #47 | 660 | 1,700 | 58 | 68 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kveta Peschke | Rita Kuti-Kis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #183 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #87 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #60 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #56 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #44 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #47 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #171 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #85 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,476 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #148 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #30 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #133 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |