H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kveta Peschke vs Tina Pisnik H2H: 1-3
Tina Pisnik holds a 3–1 lead over Kveta Peschke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Tina Pisnik leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tina Pisnik won the 2002 Roland Garros first round 2-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2002* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Tina Pisnik | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Kveta Peschke | Match data |
| Mar 7, 2002* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Tina Pisnik | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | Kveta Peschke | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2001* | Scottsdale | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Tina Pisnik | 6-2 6-3 | Kveta Peschke | Match data |
| May 17, 2000* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Kveta Peschke | 6-2 6-2 | Tina Pisnik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kveta Peschke | #264 | #26 | 1,028 | 1,826 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tina Pisnik | #592 | #29 | 1,046 | 1,721 | 91 | 117 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kveta Peschke | Tina Pisnik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #81 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #63 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #47 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #60 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #31 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #44 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #131 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #47 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #495 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #85 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #148 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #30 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #133 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |