H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

L Griffiths vs Lita Liem H2H: 0-1

Lita Liem holds a 1–0 lead over L Griffiths in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lita Liem leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lita Liem won the 1968 Australian Championships round of 32 7-5 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

L Griffiths
AUS
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lita Liem
INA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lita Liem 7-5 3-6 6-4 L Griffiths Match data Jan 25, 1968* R32 Australian Championships Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
L Griffiths — — — 1,516 1 2 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lita Liem — — — 1,707 55 86 39.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

L Griffiths Lita Liem
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1968 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0 1968 3–4 42.9% — 1,505 0 0
1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,494 0 0 1969 5–10 33.3% — 1,517 0 0
— — — — — — — 1970 4–12 25.0% — 1,504 0 0
— — — — — — — 1971 17–17 50.0% — 1,629 0 1
— — — — — — — 1972 12–22 35.3% — 1,592 0 1
— — — — — — — 1973 3–12 20.0% — 1,524 0 1
— — — — — — — 1974 3–3 50.0% — 1,563 0 1
— — — — — — — 1975 4–5 44.4% — 1,590 0 1
— — — — — — — 1978 4–1 80.0% — 1,616 0 1

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

L Griffiths Lita Liem
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1968 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1968 — — — — — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1969 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 12 12 24 50.0% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 — — — — — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
Career — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — Career 3 6 9 33.3% 23 33 56 41.1% 29 42 71 40.8% 0 5 5 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

L Griffiths Lita Liem
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1968 1499 101.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.80 0–1 — — +0.23 1968 1505 102.4 — — — — — — +23 41.2% -0.77 2–1 (67%) — — -0.04
1969 1495 100.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.13 1969 1518 116.8 — — — — — +17 -13 39.4% -0.64 0–3 (0%) — — -0.58
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1505 110.7 — — — — — +24 -33 34.2% -1.21 1–5 (17%) — — -0.65
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1629 128.7 — — — — -53 -66 -28 44.9% -0.12 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — +0.73
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1592 123.6 — — — — -75 +57 -62 36.0% -0.97 4–5 (44%) 0–2 — -2.66
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1524 112.2 — — — — -27 +75 -32 27.3% -1.61 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.33
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1564 127.3 — — — — — +70 — 53.8% +0.62 0–1 0–1 — -0.23
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1590 114.7 — — — — — +30 -54 40.9% -0.18 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — -0.02
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1616 108.0 — — — — — — -9 72.7% +1.45 1–0 — — +1.17
Career 1516 101.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — +3.33 Career 1708 125.8 — — — — -57 +37 -27 39.9% -0.62 15–20 (43%) 2–6 (25%) 96.9 -1.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.