H2H data updated: 2026-10-23 00:00 UTC

Laura Arraya vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 5-2

Laura Arraya holds a 5–2 lead over Patricia Medrado in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Laura Arraya leads 3–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1986 Zurich Open round of 32 7-5 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Arraya
PER Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main-draw meetings
Patricia Medrado
BRA Age 69

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Arraya #37 7-5 7-6 Patricia Medrado Match data Oct 9, 1986* R32 Zurich Open WTA 250 Carpet
Laura Arraya #48 7-5 6-4 Patricia Medrado Match data Mar 23, 1985* SF São Paulo Open WTA 250 Clay
Patricia Medrado 6-3 4-6 7-6 Laura Arraya Match data Apr 11, 1982* F Curitiba WTA 250 Clay
Laura Arraya 6-3 6-1 Patricia Medrado Match data Apr 3, 1982* SF Porto Alegre WTA 250 Clay
Patricia Medrado 4-6 7-6 6-4 Laura Arraya Match data Jul 5, 1981* SF Arachon WTA 250 —
Laura Arraya 6-4 7-6 Patricia Medrado Match data Jun 30, 1981* F Marseille WTA 250 —
Laura Arraya 7-5 6-3 Patricia Medrado Match data Apr 26, 1981* F São Paulo Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Arraya #192 #14 51 1,922 270 204 57.0% 0 0 0 0 10 10
Patricia Medrado #359 #67 9 1,837 156 164 48.8% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Arraya Patricia Medrado
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1981 19–8 70.4% — 1,685 0 4 — — — — — — —
18 1982 33–17 66.0% — 1,741 0 7 1975 3–1 75.0% — 1,535 0 0
19 1983 23–23 50.0% — 1,713 0 7 1976 0–2 0.0% — 1,517 0 0
20 1984 29–18 61.7% #34 1,760 0 8 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,527 0 1
21 1985 17–21 44.7% #63 1,691 0 8 1978 10–12 45.5% — 1,626 0 1
22 1986 23–24 48.9% #33 1,718 0 8 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,632 0 1
23 1987 16–14 53.3% #45 1,770 0 8 1980 22–10 68.8% — 1,656 0 4
24 — — — — — — — 1981 38–20 65.5% — 1,740 0 8
25 1989 27–12 69.2% #19 1,882 0 10 1982 33–25 56.9% — 1,779 0 10
26 1990 26–19 57.8% #21 1,821 0 10 1983 4–18 18.2% — 1,577 0 10
27 1991 28–17 62.2% #24 1,823 0 10 1984 11–15 42.3% #108 1,588 0 10
28 1992 20–19 51.3% #45 1,732 0 10 1985 8–14 36.4% #108 1,542 0 10
29 1993 9–12 42.9% #71 1,682 0 10 1986 12–14 46.2% #76 1,562 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 1987 6–13 31.6% #117 1,550 0 10
31 — — — — — — — 1988 4–11 26.7% #180 1,473 0 10

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Arraya Patricia Medrado
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 10 6 16 62.5% 23 10 33 69.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1983 10 8 18 55.6% 10 11 21 47.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1984 7 7 14 50.0% 19 7 26 73.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1977 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1985 9 9 18 50.0% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1978 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1986 3 7 10 30.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1987 7 5 12 58.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1980 — — — — 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1989 15 3 18 83.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1982 2 6 8 25.0% 27 9 36 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
26 1990 13 6 19 68.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 1991 18 12 30 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1984 3 5 8 37.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1992 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1985 1 5 6 16.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 105 80 185 56.8% 103 73 176 58.5% 16 14 30 53.3% 28 31 59 47.5% — 29 50 79 36.7% 84 75 159 52.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 3 21 24 12.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Arraya Patricia Medrado
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1981 1686 129.2 — — — — -72 — — 65.6% +0.74 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 104.4 -1.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 1742 127.0 — — — — -62 -26 — 62.7% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 8–5 (62%) 102.3 +2.31 1975 1535 102.4 — — — — — +33 — 75.0% +1.25 — — — +0.95
19 1983 1713 125.8 — — — — +7 +31 — 51.4% -0.24 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 95.2 +0.82 1976 1517 92.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.04
20 1984 1760 130.7 — — — — -102 +142 -131 53.8% +0.03 18–5 (78%) 9–4 (69%) 110.1 +0.87 1977 1528 97.0 — — — — +38 — — 33.3% -2.22 0–1 1–0 — +0.68
21 1985 1692 125.0 — — — — -1 +60 — 45.1% -0.27 8–7 (53%) 3–2 (60%) 99.8 +1.85 1978 1627 116.6 — — — — +12 -76 — 40.4% -0.75 8–2 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 109.3 +0.30
22 1986 1719 138.2 — — — — -26 +99 — 51.0% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 100.4 -2.33 1979 1633 122.5 — — — — -19 -10 — 40.9% -1.45 1–3 (25%) 5–0 (100%) 101.8 -0.21
23 1987 1771 133.6 — — — — -31 -12 -185 51.6% +0.05 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 100.0 -2.61 1980 1657 127.1 — — — — — -77 — 64.9% +1.30 6–4 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 97.7 +0.61
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1740 134.1 — — — — -99 -51 — 63.3% +1.20 7–7 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 96.3 +2.33
25 1989 1883 136.9 — — — — -7 -146 -254 65.2% +0.79 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 102.9 -0.64 1982 1780 140.9 — — — — -182 +94 — 56.6% +0.45 6–11 (35%) 7–3 (70%) 98.9 -1.80
26 1990 1821 142.0 — — — — +31 -55 -173 55.4% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 5–8 (38%) 98.6 +0.41 1983 1578 104.1 — — — — -85 +204 — 24.0% -1.80 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 94.8 +0.41
27 1991 1824 132.7 — — — — +12 -70 -95 56.9% +0.19 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 105.5 +2.96 1984 1589 120.4 — — — — -106 +162 — 48.3% -0.34 0–6 (0%) 5–3 (63%) 95.2 +0.35
28 1992 1733 139.0 — — — — +2 +53 +3 49.4% +0.06 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 +1.62 1985 1543 114.5 — — — — -89 +100 — 39.1% -0.22 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.79
29 1993 1682 125.0 — — — — +13 +124 +9 44.0% -0.66 4–4 (50%) 2–0 — -0.06 1986 1562 123.2 — — — — -78 +112 — 49.2% +0.11 5–8 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 99.4 +0.75
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1551 107.8 — — — — -104 +50 — 39.1% -0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 97.0 +0.60
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1473 104.6 — — — — -64 +64 — 31.4% -1.20 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +1.45
Career — 1923 138.4 — — — — -10 +27 -133 54.6% +0.19 90–63 (59%) 50–44 (53%) 104.5 +0.83 — 1838 128.5 — — — — -84 +56 — 49.6% +0.05 39–57 (41%) 38–30 (56%) 96.2 +2.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.