H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Laura Dupont vs Ivanna Madruga H2H: 1-1
Laura Dupont and Ivanna Madruga are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ivanna Madruga leads 1–0 on clay, while Laura Dupont leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Laura Dupont won the 1981 Surbiton fourth round 6-2 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1981* | Surbiton | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Laura Dupont | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Ivanna Madruga | Match data |
| May 29, 1980* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Ivanna Madruga | 6-1 6-0 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Dupont | — | — | — | 1,893 | 216 | 244 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Ivanna Madruga | — | — | — | 1,916 | 131 | 88 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Dupont | Ivanna Madruga | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1968 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 29–18 | 61.7% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1969 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1970 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 27–13 | 67.5% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1971 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 25–12 | 67.6% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1972 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,830 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1973 | 13–23 | 36.1% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1974 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1975 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1976 | 25–19 | 56.8% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1977 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1978 | 24–25 | 49.0% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1979 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1980 | 16–23 | 41.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1981 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1982 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |