H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Laura Dupont vs Marita Redondo H2H: 1-3
Marita Redondo holds a 3–1 lead over Laura Dupont in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marita Redondo leads 1–0 on carpet, while Laura Dupont leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marita Redondo won the 1980 Carlsbad third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 1980* | Carlsbad | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Marita Redondo | 6-1 6-4 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
| Mar 25, 1976* | Boston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Marita Redondo | 6-1 6-2 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1975* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Laura Dupont | 6-4 6-1 | Marita Redondo | Match data |
| Aug 20, 1971* | Haverford | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Marita Redondo | 7-6 5-7 6-4 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Dupont | — | — | — | 1,893 | 216 | 244 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Marita Redondo | — | — | — | 1,905 | 136 | 118 | 53.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Dupont | Marita Redondo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 24–4 | 85.7% | — | 1,807 | 0 | 7 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 29–16 | 64.4% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | 1968 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | 1969 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 16–17 | 48.5% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1970 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1971 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 19–17 | 52.8% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1972 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1973 | 13–23 | 36.1% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1974 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1975 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1976 | 25–19 | 56.8% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1977 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1978 | 24–25 | 49.0% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1979 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1980 | 16–23 | 41.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1981 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1982 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |