H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Laura Dupont vs Pam Casale H2H: 0-1

Pam Casale holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Dupont in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pam Casale leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1981 Orange round of 16 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Dupont
USA Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Pam Casale
USA Age 62 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Casale 6-0 6-0 Laura Dupont Match data Jul 31, 1981* R16 Orange WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Dupont — — — 1,895 216 244 47.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Pam Casale #671 #14 22 1,944 168 147 53.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Dupont Pam Casale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,597 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1981 30–17 63.8% — 1,810 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1982 20–23 46.5% — 1,745 0 0
19 1968 6–11 35.3% — 1,495 0 0 1983 23–20 53.5% — 1,770 0 0
20 1969 2–4 33.3% — 1,494 0 0 1984 31–17 64.6% #15 1,914 0 0
21 1970 10–7 58.8% — 1,580 0 1 1985 24–20 54.5% #14 1,814 0 0
22 1971 12–8 60.0% — 1,684 0 1 1986 16–17 48.5% #41 1,787 0 0
23 1972 7–14 33.3% — 1,647 0 1 1987 5–11 31.2% #111 1,673 0 0
24 1973 13–23 36.1% — 1,642 0 1 1988 4–10 28.6% #169 1,552 0 0
25 1974 15–17 46.9% — 1,718 0 1 1989 0–1 0.0% #225 1,547 0 0
26 1975 23–22 51.1% — 1,768 0 2 1990 0–1 0.0% #554 1,525 0 0
27 1976 25–19 56.8% — 1,820 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1977 28–22 56.0% — 1,839 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1978 24–25 49.0% — 1,730 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1979 22–20 52.4% — 1,816 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1980 16–23 41.0% — 1,717 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1981 7–16 30.4% — 1,638 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1982 6–12 33.3% — 1,593 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,591 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Dupont Pam Casale
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 17 6 23 73.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
19 1968 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1969 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 8 3 11 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7%
21 1970 — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
22 1971 — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1986 3 6 9 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
23 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1973 2 4 6 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1974 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1975 4 6 10 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1976 6 2 8 75.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 21 7 28 75.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1978 10 8 18 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1979 14 7 21 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1981 4 4 8 50.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 52 109 52.3% 88 84 172 51.2% 39 54 93 41.9% 26 52 78 33.3% — 66 49 115 57.4% 55 41 96 57.3% 15 19 34 44.1% 25 35 60 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Dupont Pam Casale
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1598 118.7 — — — — +29 — — 57.4% +0.72 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +2.02
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1811 140.3 — — — — -1 -153 -196 64.1% +1.03 3–6 (33%) 6–0 (100%) 101.9 +1.97
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1745 140.3 — — — — -54 -4 -106 50.5% +0.01 1–8 (11%) 9–5 (64%) 95.5 -3.37
19 1968 1496 96.8 — — — — — -40 +22 34.3% -1.34 1–0 — — -0.66 1983 1770 144.1 — — — — -55 +93 -103 52.1% +0.47 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.6 -1.57
20 1969 1494 102.2 — — — — — -26 — 42.9% -0.86 0–2 — — +0.11 1984 1914 155.3 — — — — +6 -60 -210 64.8% +1.01 3–6 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.3 -2.46
21 1970 1580 121.7 — — — — — +26 -62 52.5% +0.37 5–1 (83%) — — +0.70 1985 1814 137.6 — — — — +80 -54 -188 53.1% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.08
22 1971 1685 124.2 — — — — — -44 -54 57.8% +0.69 3–4 (43%) 4–2 (67%) 99.4 +1.40 1986 1788 137.1 — — — — -56 +52 — 46.8% -0.18 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -3.63
23 1972 1648 121.6 — — — — -106 -34 -46 40.8% -0.80 1–6 (14%) 2–1 (67%) 95.2 -1.41 1987 1673 114.3 — — — — -20 — -77 41.7% -0.56 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.50
24 1973 1643 133.5 — — — — -87 +25 -74 38.8% -0.88 6–7 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 100.5 -2.68 1988 1552 100.5 — — — — +25 +207 — 36.4% -0.79 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 92.4 +1.01
25 1974 1719 132.6 — — — — -45 -78 -83 47.6% -0.24 3–2 (60%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -1.83 1989 1547 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.21
26 1975 1768 135.9 — — — — -32 -30 -179 50.0% -0.14 10–8 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 107.5 -2.55 1990 1526 90.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.21
27 1976 1821 131.2 — — — — -34 -72 -180 55.9% +0.27 7–7 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1977 1839 143.1 — — — — -96 +86 -292 53.3% +0.30 12–8 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 103.4 -2.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1978 1730 130.7 — — — — -24 +52 -49 50.4% -0.03 8–13 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 94.1 +1.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1979 1816 142.5 — — — — -23 -30 -119 47.9% +0.09 9–5 (64%) 9–6 (60%) 106.3 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1980 1718 128.9 — — — — -37 +25 — 40.0% -1.02 11–6 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 102.2 -2.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1981 1638 117.4 — — — — +57 +8 +67 35.7% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 96.5 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1982 1593 108.3 — — — — +94 -39 +49 37.8% -0.78 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 97.0 -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1983 1592 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1895 136.1 — — — — -33 -4 -72 46.9% -0.27 84–80 (51%) 48–38 (56%) 104.0 -2.61 — 1944 143.5 — — — — +1 +5 -153 53.9% +0.36 32–43 (43%) 38–21 (64%) 100.1 -2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.