H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Laura Dupont vs Yvonne Vermaak H2H: 4-0
Laura Dupont holds a 4–0 lead over Yvonne Vermaak in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Laura Dupont leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Laura Dupont won the 1981 Atlanta third round 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 69
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 1981* | Atlanta | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Laura Dupont | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
| Jun 10, 1978* | Beckenham | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Laura Dupont | 6-4 6-4 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
| May 13, 1977* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Laura Dupont | 6-4 7-5 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
| Mar 11, 1976* | Tallahassee | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Laura Dupont | 1-6 6-4 7-6 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Dupont | — | — | — | 1,893 | 216 | 244 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Yvonne Vermaak | #558 | #38 | 10 | 1,891 | 239 | 249 | 49.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Dupont | Yvonne Vermaak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1968 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1969 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1970 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1971 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 15–23 | 39.5% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1972 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1973 | 13–23 | 36.1% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 19–28 | 40.4% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1974 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 36–27 | 57.1% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1975 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 33–26 | 55.9% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1976 | 25–19 | 56.8% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1977 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #41 | 1,605 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1978 | 24–25 | 49.0% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1979 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1980 | 16–23 | 41.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1981 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1982 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |