H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Laura Granville vs Stephanie Foretz Gacon H2H: 0-1

Stephanie Foretz Gacon holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Granville in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stephanie Foretz Gacon leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Stephanie Foretz Gacon won the 2002 Strasbourg Open round of 32 7-6(3) 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Granville
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Stephanie Foretz Gacon
FRA Age 45 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Stephanie Foretz Gacon 7-6(3) 7-6(5) Laura Granville #158 Match data May 23, 2002* R32 Strasbourg Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Granville #466 #28 1,063 1,699 86 108 44.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stephanie Foretz Gacon — — — 1,647 61 115 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Granville Stephanie Foretz Gacon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1998 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1999 0–1 0.0% #841 1,501 0 0 1999 1–2 33.3% — 1,511 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2000 1–2 33.3% — 1,513 0 0
20 2001 0–3 0.0% #220 1,485 0 0 2001 5–6 45.5% — 1,558 0 0
21 2002 11–10 52.4% #49 1,637 0 0 2002 11–12 47.8% — 1,604 0 0
22 2003 22–22 50.0% #46 1,652 0 0 2003 12–15 44.4% — 1,589 0 0
23 2004 17–19 47.2% #74 1,600 0 0 2004 3–10 23.1% — 1,532 0 0
24 2005 12–15 44.4% #60 1,613 0 0 2005 5–14 26.3% — 1,500 0 0
25 2006 12–16 42.9% #68 1,588 0 0 2006 5–14 26.3% — 1,443 0 0
26 2007 11–15 42.3% #61 1,612 0 0 2007 2–6 25.0% — 1,457 0 0
27 2008 0–2 0.0% #379 1,593 0 0 2008 0–2 0.0% — 1,455 0 0
28 2009 0–2 0.0% #293 1,565 0 0 2009 2–7 22.2% — 1,421 0 0
29 2010 0–2 0.0% #448 1,541 0 0 2010 0–3 0.0% — 1,401 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2011 2–6 25.0% — 1,406 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2012 10–10 50.0% — 1,513 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2013 2–5 28.6% — 1,501 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Granville Stephanie Foretz Gacon
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1998 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
20 2001 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2002 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2003 11 13 24 45.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2004 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 1 7 8 12.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2005 7 13 20 35.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2005 2 9 11 18.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
25 2006 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2006 3 5 8 37.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2007 8 9 17 47.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2007 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2008 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2009 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 60 75 135 44.4% 6 19 25 24.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — 31 59 90 34.4% 17 37 54 31.5% 11 17 28 39.3% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 71/167 of Laura Granville's and 74/136 of Stephanie Foretz Gacon's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laura Granville Stephanie Foretz Gacon
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2003 8/44 1.4 2.8 61.8% 60.8% 50.1% 51.8% 41.7% 56.7% 47.3% 2003 4/27 1.5 6.8 53.2% 54.0% 39.1% 53.8% 40.0% 47.2% 46.4%
23 2004 5/36 1.0 2.4 61.3% 58.6% 50.7% 61.2% 54.8% 55.6% 42.0% 2004 5/13 1.2 5.2 56.7% 53.9% 47.6% 47.1% 38.1% 51.2% 42.6%
24 2005 9/27 1.1 1.6 65.1% 64.3% 53.0% 50.2% 56.4% 60.4% 39.3% 2005 6/19 2.5 7.0 59.4% 57.9% 44.5% 44.9% 46.2% 52.7% 44.4%
25 2006 20/28 1.7 2.6 63.3% 64.3% 46.6% 60.2% 45.3% 58.0% 42.2% 2006 12/19 1.8 4.7 61.9% 55.5% 38.3% 47.5% 40.8% 49.8% 41.6%
26 2007 23/26 1.8 2.3 67.0% 59.8% 46.1% 58.3% 50.4% 55.3% 40.4% 2007 4/8 1.8 6.8 57.8% 60.3% 32.5% 55.1% 54.2% 48.5% 36.2%
27 2008 2/2 3.0 1.0 73.1% 51.1% 42.9% 43.7% 22.5% 48.9% 30.0% 2008 1/2 1.0 1.0 70.7% 58.5% 23.5% 33.3% 100.0% 48.3% 34.6%
28 2009 2/2 1.5 1.5 56.1% 54.9% 44.4% 29.2% 0.0% 50.3% 29.9% 2009 8/9 1.8 4.8 62.8% 61.0% 46.9% 44.2% 42.6% 55.2% 41.2%
29 2010 2/2 2.0 1.0 58.9% 64.5% 48.8% 33.3% 25.0% 58.0% 30.4% 2010 2/3 1.5 3.5 59.5% 52.1% 24.3% 28.6% 7.1% 41.4% 30.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 7/8 3.0 4.0 58.8% 58.6% 43.5% 50.7% 57.5% 52.6% 39.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 18/20 2.6 3.6 55.5% 63.4% 44.5% 58.3% 46.7% 55.2% 44.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 6/7 1.3 3.7 55.2% 52.9% 37.3% 36.4% 53.7% 46.0% 46.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 1/1 13.0 7.0 64.1% 73.8% 36.2% 50.0% 42.9% 60.3% 41.5%
Career — 71/194 1.6 2.3 64.4% 61.4% 47.8% 55.3% 46.1% 56.6% 40.8% — 74/176 2.2 4.7 58.5% 58.6% 41.4% 49.0% 45.9% 51.6% 42.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Granville Stephanie Foretz Gacon
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1998 1512 104.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 1501 95.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.04 1999 1511 107.7 — — — — — +38 — 37.5% -1.38 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.39
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1513 105.7 — — — — — +27 — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 1–0 — +0.01
20 2001 1486 117.9 — — — — +27 — — 14.3% -3.14 0–1 — — -0.28 2001 1559 118.8 — — — — +31 -46 — 46.4% -0.04 3–3 (50%) 1–0 — -0.48
21 2002 1638 133.0 — — — — -22 — +41 47.8% +0.09 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 103.7 -0.79 2002 1605 127.2 — — — — -4 -29 -66 50.0% -0.10 1–3 (25%) 5–1 (83%) 101.5 +0.03
22 2003 1652 130.1 +0.38 +1.61 1.093 51.8% -4 -93 +67 51.9% +0.13 6–10 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 99.7 +0.59 2003 1589 115.5 -3.06 +0.16 0.879 47.0% 0 -51 +46 43.3% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 4–0 (100%) 104.2 +0.97
23 2004 1600 113.5 -0.02 -1.05 0.945 48.6% +45 -119 — 46.3% -0.39 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 99.5 +1.57 2004 1532 111.6 -1.58 -0.22 0.873 47.0% -19 +10 — 31.3% -1.19 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 100.0 -0.31
24 2005 1613 122.6 +2.34 -2.15 0.993 50.2% -27 — +133 46.8% -0.27 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.60 2005 1501 103.6 -0.99 -0.13 0.938 48.6% -44 -15 +148 29.3% -1.44 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 -0.82
25 2006 1589 119.7 +1.32 -1.98 1.003 50.3% +21 -140 +111 43.5% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 +0.28 2006 1444 101.7 -4.22 -1.54 0.829 45.8% +32 -13 — 32.6% -1.22 3–5 (38%) 0–2 — +0.07
26 2007 1612 125.6 +0.15 -1.84 0.904 48.0% +10 -209 +140 44.1% -0.54 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 -1.20 2007 1457 115.6 -1.06 -2.17 0.702 42.7% +26 — — 27.8% -1.61 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.62
27 2008 1593 108.1 -0.86 -1.03 0.587 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.41 2008 1455 106.9 +3.39 +4.25 0.669 41.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.46
28 2009 1565 93.8 -0.31 -3.03 0.603 39.1% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — 0–1 — -0.04 2009 1421 97.6 -0.52 -1.66 0.920 47.9% +55 -3 +137 30.4% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.41
29 2010 1542 100.5 -0.89 -3.05 0.723 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13 2010 1402 102.9 -1.39 -0.34 0.524 35.8% — — — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 0–1 — -0.12
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1407 106.9 -1.79 -0.90 0.842 46.7% +64 -4 — 31.6% -1.32 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1513 113.5 -0.88 +0.34 1.000 50.1% -12 -50 +63 52.3% -0.32 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.73
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1502 102.0 -3.63 +0.69 0.868 46.6% -19 -44 — 31.3% -1.38 1–1 1–0 — -0.10
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1491 103.0 -2.87 -1.23 1.046 51.0% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.03
Career — 1699 128.3 +0.70 -1.52 0.940 48.8% +7 -125 +103 45.4% -0.33 24–28 (46%) 15–18 (45%) 97.7 -0.44 — 1648 117.4 -1.86 -0.48 0.879 47.2% +3 -19 +71 38.2% -0.88 21–35 (38%) 21–15 (58%) 102.5 -0.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.