H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Laura Pous-Tio vs Anastasiya Yakimova H2H: 1-1
Laura Pous-Tio and Anastasiya Yakimova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laura Pous-Tio leads 1–0 on clay, while Anastasiya Yakimova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasiya Yakimova won the 2007 Australian Open first round 6-2 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 41
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 39
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2007* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Anastasiya Yakimova | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | Laura Pous-Tio | Match data |
| May 12, 2005* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Laura Pous-Tio | 6-1 7-5 | Anastasiya Yakimova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Pous-Tio | #776 | #72 | 930 | 1,621 | 41 | 62 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anastasiya Yakimova | #1,233 | #49 | 989 | 1,526 | 30 | 74 | 28.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Pous-Tio | Anastasiya Yakimova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #67 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #129 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #101 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #103 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #120 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #62 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #108 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #256 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #75 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2012 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |