H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Laura Rossouw vs Tory Ann Fretz H2H: 4-1
Laura Rossouw holds a 4–1 lead over Tory Ann Fretz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Laura Rossouw leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tory Ann Fretz won the 1973 Houston fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 1973* | Houston | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Tory Ann Fretz | 6-2 6-3 | Laura Rossouw | Match data |
| Apr 20, 1973* | Jacksonville | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Laura Rossouw | 6-4 1-6 6-1 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
| Feb 9, 1973* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Laura Rossouw | 6-7 7-6 6-4 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
| Jun 23, 1971* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Laura Rossouw | 7-9 6-4 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
| Jun 5, 1971* | Manchester | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Laura Rossouw | 6-4 6-3 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Rossouw | — | — | — | 1,765 | 117 | 125 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Tory Ann Fretz | — | — | — | 1,802 | 104 | 102 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Rossouw | Tory Ann Fretz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 27–20 | 57.4% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 28–14 | 66.7% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1973 | 17–25 | 40.5% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1974 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 10–20 | 33.3% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |